I would start the steps deep than either program recommend and shorten the intermediate steps , especially the 50-40-30 beyond what Bruce recommends . The reason for the first part is the "minimum" rule , and the reason for the second is that one can off gas more safely in bubble form up higher right before the oxygen steps, assuming no PFO or other shunt. In fact, off gassing in bubble form up high is more efficient and effective, and before anyone starts howling, this is what you are doing by getting out of the water after the dive ANYWAY. I do not know what those setting are - I have not used a deco program in years. -----Original Message----- From: NPerry255@ao*.co* [mailto:NPerry255@ao*.co*] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 4:27 PM To: trey@ne*.co*; techdiver@aquanaut.com Subject: Re: WKPP deco history George, Great stuff -- Thanks! Deco follow-up: I've seen RGBM tables (ranged), but they don't reflect my mixes (often higher He%) or give credit for 50% O2 at 70', and are not multi-level; I've been happily using GUE Deco Planner -- low Gradient Factor set to 15%, because this closely simulates RGBM deep stops. However, because it's Haldanian-based, the 20' & 10' stops lengthen out. Although my dives are short (20 min.) bounce profiles, max. 220' - 250', they are in cold, OPEN ocean, where surface conditions can turn nasty during hang. Would you recommend "opening up" the high G.F. (set at 85%), or you mentioned "tricking" Buhlman-model programs by inputting lower He/higher O2 percentages than actual? Any advice would be appreciated (I don't want to "fudge" it and cut the wrong corners). Thanks for helping out new list members! Nelson Perry -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]