Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: trey@ne*.co* (Trey)
To: <HeliumDiver@ao*.co*>, <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: 80/20 deco
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2000 21:27:47 -0400
I see this shill is back for more. Listen, TDI
shill, you still have not answered my question to
you about why it is not ok for me to hold such a
distaste for the bullshit TDI puts out and its
abysmal track record, its fat slob deep air diving
leader, and the FACT that Mitch Skaggs of TDI put
out a fake post in my name calling the president of
Scuba Pro a "sand nigger" while he also worked for
the company himself, a mistake which cost that
asshole the rest of his credit life and any
credibility in the dive industry in a Miami court.
Answer that , you piece of shit.

Also, hypocrite, while you are discussing this
bullshit about 80/20 and ppo2 relative changes,
maybe your stupid fucking lying shill ass could tell
us all about the ppo2 at 220 feet on air - a TDI
practice that was only discontinued after they lost
the Missavage case ( deep air training death), how
in Fat Slob's book "Deep Diving", the practice of
diving elevated ppo2s well beyond 1.6 as BOTTOM gas
is commonplace and RECOMMENDED, how TDI can
recommend bottom gas of beyond 1.4 ppo2 when
commercial diving has long ago discarded that as
dangerous for even a HARD HAT diver, you dumb fuck,
and how anything that comes out of your mouth in the
way of justification of stupid and dangerous
bullshit practices is anything but an attempt to
cover up a huge LIE, when you do not have the balls
to use your own name.

Of course, if I were as publicly stupid as you, I
would not use my own name either, but at least drop
the TRAVESTY of the "helium diver" handle when we
all know what  TDI stands for and represents .

>>      1.6 is 1.6 is 1.6 is 1.6 . . . 1.6!  These
people that you speak of
>>  that have to use 50%, if they use it at 70 feet
they are still facing the
>>  same pO2 they would see if they were to use O2
at 20.
>
>Things aren't that simple.  While the PO2 of 50% at
70 is 1.56, a change
>in depth to 75 feet ups it to 1.64, a difference of
only .08 and not a big
>deal.  The same five foot change in depth on 100%
at 20 feet takes
>the PO2 from 1.61 to 1.76, a much more significant
increase of 1.5.
>
>A similar statement can be made for 80%.
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to
`techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to
`techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]