Allyson, Please explain the significance of the number of theoretical compartments=20 either on-gassing or off-gassing, verses the one theoretical compartment tha= t=20 happens to be controlling the deco at any one particular time. Karl In a message dated 8/28/00 12:15:12 PM, AllysonClagett writes: << Hi Karl, I ran your 80/20 ("stroke mix") numbers on decoplanner and would get out of=20 the water 3 minutes faster than using the DIR deco gases. I found that you=20 do get out of the water faster, however, you get out having on-gased a lot=20 more Nitrogen. I am addressing the issue of Nitrogen here, I haven't enough education on th= e=20 matter to speak of anything else. Let me just say, that, the goal of decompressing is to do it efficiently.=20 Efficiently, meaning one should accelerate the elimination of the inert=20 gasses (Nitrogen and Helium) in his "fast loading tissue compartments" while= =20 minimizing the on gassing in his "slow loading tissue compartments." If he=20 doesn't decompress efficiently he may feel tired and down right lethargic=20 after his dives. If you compare your "dive" to 200 feet on 18/35 for 30 min, then deco-ing on= =20 EAN 36 @ 110ft, then EAN 80 @ 30 ft to the DIR method of deco-ing (EAN50 @ 7= 0=20 feet, 100 OXYGEN @20 feet) you will notice that the DIR method is more=20 efficient. (Hit the "analyse" button after you plan the dives.) At 110 feet when you would switch to your EAN 36 you are now on-gassing=20 Nitrogen in 13 of your tissue compartments whereas on your bottom mix you=20 were ongassing in only 11 of your tissue compartments. Your deco gas would=20 have you on-gassing more Nitrogen than your bottom mix. =20 Using the deco plan (80/20) that gets you out of the water faster has your=20 tissue compartments on-gassing more Nitrogen than the (DIR) method through=20 all segments of the dive. Except at segment 21 (where you ascend from 40 t= o=20 30 feet) you are now off-gassing Nitrogen in all your tissue compartments bu= t=20 it does not make up for all the extra on-gassing you did during your dive up= =20 to this point. At segment 21 the DIR deco is off-gassing in all but 3=20 compartments=85in 10 more ft they too will be off- gassing in all compartmen= ts=20 and off-gassing a lot more Nitrogen than the deeper deco stop using 80/20.=20 This is one of the reasons why the DIR plan is the way to go, to efficiently= =20 off gas the Nitrogen. =20 Allyson Clagett In a message dated 08/26/2000 4:40:02 AM Eastern Daylight Time,=20 KRussellTX@ao*.co* writes: << I have been reading in this group how 80/20 is not the gas to use for=20 deco. =20 I have also been reading that Decoplanner is great and EAN50 @ 70 ft. and=20 100=20 % oxygen at 20 ft. is the DIR way to go. In truth I haven't got the=20 slightest idea what the "oxygen window" means unless it simply refers to=20 using the closest PO2 that is below 1.6 that you can get to. =20 Now the question I have to ask is that if 80/20 is only used by strokes, wh= y=20 is it that on a dive to 200 ft. on 18/35 for 30 minutes, doing a deco using= =20 EAN 36 @ 110 ft. and EAN 80 @ 30 ft. actually results in a shorter deco tha= n=20 EAN50 @ 70 ft. and 100% oxygen @ 20 ft.? =20 Any explanations why the stroke mix seems to get you out of the water soone= r? =20 K. Russell >> >> -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]