Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
--=====================_85910931==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Karl,
>Christian, part of the learning process is to think and analyze for yourself.
> This is clearly not allowed under the DIR regime. I learn from reading
> this
>list. A lot actually. But the pomposity of some of the members is
>intolerable. People ask questions and then get flamed if they further
>question the garbage that is sometimes (notice I said sometimes and not often
>or even usually) spewed back for answers.
After reading through your post I am lead to believe that you were just
looking for a platform to voice your anti-DIR rhetoric. If your were truly
looking for answers, did I not provide them for you? Granted I gave you
the short and simple version because I am too busy to go into great detail,
but nonetheless, in my opinion, I answered your question. You have not
responded.
There is a tremendous volume of information that is available to you,
and to others, one just has to ask and then listen. You did ask, but then
you changed tune and went on the offensive, why? Is it possible that you
are just like the others that came before and just wanted a soapbox; like
the anonymous person in the CDS Journal who was offended by George's
picture so he complained, yet offered nothing of his own.
I am not wanting to "attack" anyone, I was just looking for an
explanation as to why you have seemingly chosen to ignore the reply that
hopefully answered your question.
Independently thinking,
Scott Hunsucker
--=====================_85910931==_.ALT
Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
<html>
Karl,<br>
<br>
<blockquote type=cite cite>Christian, part of the learning process is to
think and analyze for yourself. <br>
This is clearly not allowed under the DIR regime. I learn
from reading this <br>
list. A lot actually. But the pomposity of some of the
members is <br>
intolerable. People ask questions and then get flamed if they
further <br>
question the garbage that is sometimes (notice I said sometimes and not
often <br>
or even usually) spewed back for answers. </blockquote> <br>
After reading through your post I am lead to believe that
you were just looking for a platform to voice your anti-DIR
rhetoric. If your were truly looking for answers, did I not provide
them for you? Granted I gave you the short and simple version
because I am too busy to go into great detail, but nonetheless, in my
opinion, I answered your question. You have not responded.
<br>
There is a tremendous volume of information that is
available to you, and to others, one just has to ask and then
listen. You did ask, but then you changed tune and went on the
offensive, why? Is it possible that you are just like the others
that came before and just wanted a soapbox; like the anonymous person in
the <u>CDS Journal</u> who was offended by George's picture so he
complained, yet offered nothing of his own.<br>
I am not wanting to "attack" anyone, I was just
looking for an explanation as to why you have seemingly chosen to ignore
the reply that hopefully answered your question.<br>
Independently thinking,<br>
Scott Hunsucker<br>
<br>
</html>
--=====================_85910931==_.ALT--
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]