Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Oh, no, not this again... The fact is that getting out of the water in the least amount of time should not be the primary objective. Do us all a favor go to Kevin Connell's archives and do a search for 80/20 or Bakers Dozen and save us a lot of bandwidth. http://www.nwls.com/list-archive/ If you have any additional questions, come on back and ask. Jim ------------------------------------------------------------------- Learn About Trimix at http://www.cisatlantic.com/trimix/ > From: <KRussellTX@ao*.co*> > Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2000 02:30:37 EDT > To: techdiver@aquanaut.com > Subject: 80/20 deco > > I have been reading in this group how 80/20 is not the gas to use for deco. > I have also been reading that Decoplanner is great and EAN50 @ 70 ft. and 100 > % oxygen at 20 ft. is the DIR way to go. In truth I haven't got the > slightest idea what the "oxygen window" means unless it simply refers to > using the closest PO2 that is below 1.6 that you can get to. > > Now the question I have to ask is that if 80/20 is only used by strokes, why > is it that on a dive to 200 ft. on 18/35 for 30 minutes, doing a deco using > EAN 36 @ 110 ft. and EAN 80 @ 30 ft. actually results in a shorter deco than > EAN50 @ 70 ft. and 100% oxygen @ 20 ft.? > > Any explanations why the stroke mix seems to get you out of the water sooner? > > K. Russell > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]