Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: Chris
To: Hellas <100422.2334@co*.co*>
Subject: Re: Ascent rates
From: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.Ha*.Or*>
Cc: Richard
Cc: Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.Ha*.Or*>
Cc: Tech
Cc: diver
Cc: forum <techdiver@opal.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 1995 08:01:20 +22305714 (HST)
> We have habitually now used 'deep washout' stops on trimix jumps. This is
> always on an intermediate Eanx mix (usually the travel gas) and the stop
> is always done at the maximum ppo2 (1.6bar) and is of a couple of minutes
> duration. Assuming that you believe the schedules you are cutting work -
> you must do else you would not use them! when this deep stop is put into
> the profile it does numerically shorten the in water time. If used as an
> addition to any schedule it follows that the safety edge is worth having. 

Isn't it amazing that people all over the world are independantly coming
to similar conclusions about the value of adding extra "deep" stops to
their program's suggested initial stop?  Question:  Do you mean that
adding the stop to the decompression profile on the table-generating
software (i.e., making a multi-level dive forcing a stop at a depth
greather than the initial decompression ceiling), rather than switching
mixtures at the same depth but proceeding directly to the first
decompression stop suggested by the computer, actually calls for LESS in-water
time?  If the software follows Haldanian/Buhlmann math, I'm surprised at
this result.  In any case, I think the extra stop, regardless of whether
or not it is accounted for by whatever generates the table, will
ultimately reduce the probability of a DCI hit.

Aloha,
Rich

deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]