I am also convinced that ascent protocol is insufficiently accounted for in current diving tables. In my original open water training, our instructor used the bottle of Coke physical model to give us some intuition about decompression. The more that I think about it, the better a (qualititative) model I think it is. Try it yourself. Use a warm bottle of any carbonated water, or shake it up to get a greater overpressure. Sure this is a air+CO2 gas mixture to water + dissolved CO2/H2CO3 interface, but the dynamics of this system are extremely evocative of the human diver. Fortunately, this model seems to react much faster, and at much lower pressures, making experiments very easy. Now, the key to opening a warm, well shook up bottle of Coke without wearing it, is to release pressure slowly and evenly. This is impossible with a can, but with a screw cap you can monitor the flow rate of gas out of the system by how loud and how high it whistles. Let the gas out too quickly, and you get a run away bubbling. Even if you get this run away bubbling, you can decompress it away, by closing the cap and waiting for the bubbles to decrease. I interpret conventional staged decompression, with the 60 fpm ascent rate, as being parallel to this mode of decompression. I found that I eliminated my post dive fatigue when I started hanging deeper than indicated. This is difficult for table divers, but pretty easy for computer divers. The conclusion of all this for me? a) Focussing on so-called "no decompression" limits is counter productive; b) Focussing on getting to "ceilings" is also counter productive. Thoughts, especially alternative points of view, are welcome. Wrolf
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]