Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Kent, I am not that smart, but I did long ago look at tables all around the tables I was planning to see what they looked like, and that is a good idea, but in reality the "smart" thing I did was 1) get tested for any shunts, 2) ignore anything that was previously taught, and 3) try it too see what would happen . -----Original Message----- From: Kent Lind <klind@al*.ne*> To: Gliviak Jozef <Jozef.Gliviak@co*.co*>; trey@ne*.co* <trey@ne*.co*> Cc: Techdiver@Aquanaut. Com <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Date: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 5:01 PM Subject: RE: Lost deco gas - stops adjustments >Jozef: > >Are you using Deco Planner software? > >It is very easy to run contingency tables for the loss of one or both deco >gases. I don't trust myself to be as smart as George when I'm underwater so >I just print contingency tables for lost deco gas and put them in my >wetnotes in my drysuit pocket. > >Run a bunch of contingency tables and compare them and think about what they >are showing you. I think you'll find that for most normal scenarios you >will have shorter deco using only 50/50 than using only O2. > >If you are generating contingency tables now and they don't look correct to >you (you say you're getting ridiculously long schedules) then what makes you >think that your regular deco schedule is any good if it's coming from the >same source? > >-Kent- > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Gliviak, Jozef [mailto:Jozef.Gliviak@co*.co*] >> Sent: Tuesday, August 15, 2000 6:09 AM >> To: 'trey@ne*.co*' >> Cc: Techdiver@Aquanaut. Com >> Subject: RE: Lost deco gas - stops adjustments >> >> >> Hello Trey, >> >> Thanx for an answer. >> >> >Joseph, deco is bullshit they way it is taught and >> >perceived by most people. >> I do have that feeling so that's why I'm asking and trying to get >> more info >> from you :-) >> >> > It is so simple, but >> > everyone makes it so hard an mysterious. >> Looks the same to me. It would be nice, if you could bring some light on >> this. It's very hard to get more information on this subject. Any advice >> where to search ? When using standart theories (Buhlmann, etc) I'v got >> ridiculously long schedules which seems to me far from reality. >> >> If I understand well, in case of lost N50 your advice is to just >> go on like >> usual and start adding something on shalower stops (like 12m or later ?). >> How much you thing would be sufficient for a person in shape ? +20% of >> planned time ? More or less? >> >> What would be the difference in case of lost oxygen? We are in >> the the most >> important part of deco so I expect that this is much more serious >> than lost >> N50. >> >> Best regards >> Jozef Gliviak >> Slovakia >> >> -- >> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. >> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. >> > > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]