Hi David, You have raised a rather interesting question (the definition of tech. diving), to which I am afraid, there may not be a single concise answer; similar to how many angels can dance on the head of a pin or how do you define "great" music. However, the answer that I like to think about and discuss with my students is that tech. diving involves underwater situations where should a problem should arise, a rapid ascent to the surface is not a possible solution to the problem. That is, some other answer to the problem must be found, and it must be found underwater. This definition encompasses activities such as cave diving, wreck penetrations, ice diving, and decompression diving. This clearly is not a universally accepted definition of tech. diving in that there are certainly questionable gray areas. For example, I personally have difficulty considering a rebreather dive to be a tech. dive if there is no decompression required at any time during the dive. But there are other opinions. And my definition has no reference to the commonly accepted 130 ft. recreational diving depth limit. I think it would be interesting to get some other opinions from the members of this list, as to their definitions of tech. diving. David, thanks for bringing up this thread. Perhaps we can get some interesting opinions generated. Take care and safe diving, Scott In a message dated 7/13/00 2:13:50 PM, David.Applin@ta*.co* writes: << Now this is the Techdiver list -- yes! Would it be an good idea to define what tech diving is? Actually define where, in the opinion of the most experienced, the cut off between recreational diving and tech diving lays? >> -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]