Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Kent Lind" <klind@al*.ne*>
To: "Tech list" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: Dive Master's Wanted
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2000 14:57:05 -0800

> Here is the drug testing issue from my point of view.
>
> (Kent, you still live in Alaska, stop me when I am wrong)

[long story snipped]

Scott:  I haven't seen much random testing up here.  Most of the at-sea
fisheries work on vessels and processors is short-term contract work.  You sign
a 2-4 month contract in Seattle, go do a physical and drug test, hop a plane to
Alaska, work at sea for for a couple months then hop a plane home.  Every time
you go back up it's usually a new contract and you repeat the process except
that you usually only have to do a physical once a year.  It's probably very
similar to the oil rig work in the Gulf of Mexico actually.

When I was doing this, most of the big fisheries companies would send their
applicants to Ballard Hospital in Seattle to pee in a cup so on any given day
you might see a dozen or more fishermen sitting around the waiting room of
Ballard Hospital waiting to pee in a cup.  Most of the boats also had on-board
drug test kits so if they hire anyone off the docks in Alaska the ship's medic
just does the test and sends off the results.  You don't even get to setp onto
any documented fishing boat or processor in Alaska without peeing in a cup.

Some of the bigger companies running factory trawlers or processors may also do
random tests.  I was always working as a Federal observer so I never had to deal
with that.

As for the rest of your message about the injustice of it all.  You have no
argument from me.  I'm not an advocate of drug testing at all.  It rubs me the
wrong way just like it does you.  The only reason I started this thread was to
point out that drug testing was probably not something that the dive shop in
question thought up on their own.  It is required by law for companies employing
people at sea.

But just because I'm uncomfortable about drug testing from a civil rights
standpoint doesn't mean I think anyone should be working at sea under the
influence of any kind of legal or illegal drug.  The Bering Sea is a dangerous
enough place to work without having to worry about whether that guy operating a
deck crane over your head in icy 20 ft seas is wasted or drunk.

I will say this though.  Given what I've seen working at sea in the industrial
fishing industry, I am absolutely positive that drug and alcohol use would be
totally rampant were it not for drug testing and zero tolerance by the
companies.  The industry has to be super hard-assed about it or drug use would
explode instantly.  The way it works now, you get caught smuggling drugs or
booze onto any factory trawler or processor in Alaska and you will find your ass
booted off immediately and with extreme prejudice.  None of this counseling
crap.  You will find youself standing on the dock of some lonely fishing outpost
on the Bering Sea without even a plane ticket home.  And that's the way it
should be.  Most of the companies actually search allc crew members bags for
drugs, booze, and weapons before even letting them on board.  Like it or not,
that's how things are done in the world of industial fishing.

Kent Lind
Juneau, Alaska

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]