>Since the behavior (i.e., degree of saturation) attained by any single >pure substance under varying conditions *should* be fairly "algorith-able" >(my neologism of the day!), I can't see any real adavntage to carrying >the actual substances on each dive, as opposed to virtual analogs of a >lot of them :-). As a lover of mechanical gadgetry, however, the old >gas-bag&orifice decompression meters (which, as ddoolette pointed out, >resembled this concept) were way fascinating. > >Dave Ventre >Quincy, MA > Weinke (sp?) in one of his books suggests that nonsupersaturation bubble models require more computing power than can comfortably fit on your wrist. Hence a physical analog is one possible way around this problem. In the case of supersaturation models both digital and analog devices already exist. I expect that the real problem with bubble models is the cost of testing any new decompression model. When someone is ready to put up the $$'s we will get a nonsupersaturation model. Barrie Kovish Vancouver, Canada bmk@ds*.bc*.ca*
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]