Den 30-05-00 02:49 skrev Scott Gudmundsen (At 30-05-00 02:49 Scott Gudmundsen wrote)... >Ee, > > >Is it better if we were to have 2 sets of the same 1st and 2nd stage ? > > >Response: Not necessarily. Some experienced divers like to have one first >stage a piston design, and the other a diaghram. I would think that any high >quality, reliable regulator set would work just fine. I dive in such cold >water however, that my choice of backgas regulators is limited. Currently I'm >diving a U.S.Divers Arctic and a U.S. Divers Conshelf 12. Neither of these >have ever frozen up on me in 33-35 degree water. Neither does the Apeks (or whatever they are called at your end). > > > > i was thinkning of getting the Apeks TX 50 DS4 1st stage and tx50 2nd stage > > > for both my main and my backup reg. >Response: I've never used those, so won't comment. I don't know from >first-hand experience. Consider making the backup (necklace) reg a non air balanced so as to diminish the probability of freeflows, etc. Were I to buy new backgas regs now the choice would be: DS4 + TX40/50 primary DS4 + ScubaPro R380 secondary. > > deco gas would be either Apeks TX50 nitrox with DS4 1st stage or the > > Mk20/G250 Scubapro nitrox. > > >Response: Sounds good to me... it's really hard to beat the Mk20 G250. Don't >worry about having a "Nitrox" rated regulator. This is dive-shop industry >hype. Any good quality, modern regulator will work just fine without the B.S. >"Nitrox" designation... Unless you can find it on sale... then, what the >heck... buy it. I'd probebly get the 'real' TX50 (with the DST first stage) - it's nice havin a swirvel on the deco bottles IMO. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]