Nope. He said very clearly that it was a 14,000 foot, 28,OOO foot round trip, penetration. >I thought it was generally accepted that the "14,000" foot penetration was >in reality a 14,000 round trip (7,000 each way)? Isn't this the way the so >cleverly crafted it in their written reports? Maybe the WKPP needs to >rewrite their documentation to read "36,000" foot penetration? :-) -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]