Of course, the distinction is: A) going to 200.5MSW to explore something that is there and that you are interested in VS. B) going to 200.5MSW to touch the sand and ascend so that you can claim a "record". I'm trying to figure out how (B) is useful for anything, but I guess to each their own. Maybe it's the showing that it can be done, and survived, but Jim Bowden (Batman), and others have already shown that some time ago. Don W. Chris Elmore wrote: > > Unfortunately, the distinction will be lost on many. > C. > >>> Hans Petter Roverud <proverud@on*.no*> 03/02 7:37 PM >>> > At 04:42 PM 3/2/00 -0500, you wrote: > >Can anyone tell me what the point of this was? > >C. > > <snip> > > Don't get me wrong, I don't accept this level of risk myself but the > "what's the point" remark doesn't ring true from a technical diver. We all > do stuff that would make couch potatoes ask "what's the point". Let's not > discourage adventure and rather focus on doing it right. > > regards, > > Hans > Norway > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]