Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01BF8567.C87500A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This is a question to any body on the list that has any experience with = this matter. Many people advocate the use of the Scubapro MK20/G250, however = according to Scubapro the G500 is a better performer than the older = G250.=20 I would like to know if any one knows if there is a difference around = the 150m (500ft) range between the two, and which is the better = performer.=20 Also due to the fact that Scubapro claim the G500 to be the best second = stage they have ever manufactured, is there any valid reason to prefer = the G250 over it. I also know that many people who use the G250 on moderately deep dives = have many good things to say about the second stage, but my question = relates to deeper dives. I would appreciate all of your comments. O. Harpaz. ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01BF8567.C87500A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="windows-1255" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dwindows-1255" = http-equiv=3DContent-Type> <META content=3D"MSHTML 5.00.2314.1000" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>This is a question to any body on the = list that has=20 any experience with this matter.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Many people advocate the use of the = Scubapro=20 MK20/G250, however according to Scubapro the G500 is a better performer = than the=20 older G250. </FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I would like to know if any one knows = if there is a=20 difference around the 150m (500ft) range between the two, and which is = the=20 better performer. </FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Also due to the fact that Scubapro = claim the G500=20 to be the best second stage they have ever manufactured, is there any = valid=20 reason to prefer the G250 over it.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I also know that many people who use = the G250 on=20 moderately deep dives have many good things to say about the second = stage, but=20 my question relates to deeper dives.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I would appreciate all of your=20 comments.</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>O. Harpaz.</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_000B_01BF8567.C87500A0-- -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]