Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <ajmarve@ba*.ne*>
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2000 13:55:30 -0500
To: Scott Hunsucker <swhac@pc*.gu*.ne*>, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: My final post dealing w/ Mr. Black
excellent use of bold face and italics, scoring: 9.5, 9.4, 9.6, 10.0,
and 6.3 from the romanian judge.............

regards,

Al Marvelli
PS
Dr. Quack, shut the fuck up already.

Scott Hunsucker wrote:

>  Dr. Black,
>    I said my last post to you would be my final one; however, I guess
> I've fallen for the bait.
>
>> Don't have a knipshin, but there really is a credibility problem
>> with your data.
>
> It is not my data, I did not do the calculations, I just presented the
> information because that is where the thread took us.
>
>>  And given the checkered past and present of your rogue's gallery of
>> divers, there very likely will always be a credibility problem.
>
> Have you ever meet a member of the WKPP?  The WKPP is composed of many
> people, most of us are professionals, and everyone of us is quite nice
> and willing to share information with those that ask.  Our credibility
> can lie on the track record of George and the team, sir.
>
>> You and your team are looking for respect, and guess what Adolph,
>> you ain't gonna get it.
>
> I am not looking for respect as you put it, I am looking for new
> cave.  The Adolph commit was unnecessary and for all of those in the
> world that lost loved ones due to Adolph, I sincerely hope you rot in
> hell you pestilent, feeble minded bastard.
>
>> You say the world of diving medicine isn't ready for you and your
>> team, when in truth the world of diving medicine would welcome your
>> accomplishments if only they looked even half-way credible.
>
> Are you not an Ophthalmologist?  How do you speak for the world of
> diving medicine?  They were not ready for us at that presentation
> because they are conservative, they have to be.
>
>> You say "the WKPP has amassed an amazing safety record, all the
>> while doing dives that no one else in the world does."  So are we
>> supposed to believe this too, just like we're supposed to believe
>> that oxygen exposures up to 20,000 percent are safe?
>
> Why don't you pick up any magazine, watch any video, or talk to people
> that cave dive, you will find your answers.  You really must enjoy
> this to continue to hold a failing position.  I never said that
> exceeding the "clock" was safe, I said we have done it somewhere
> between 15,000 and 20,000 percent.  I guess you have not done your
> math or homework on this subject.
>
>> You are going to have to do a much better job of convincing the
>> majority of disbelievers if you expect to get any kind of respect
>> from the professional agencies you are so quick to chastise, and
>> that very well might start with losing the militant, maverick
>> attitude you so fondly cherish and display.
>
> I do not have to do anything but dive sir.  I began all of this
> posting so people might learn, yet I am too busy answering you to put
> anything else out there.  I dive for fun, the agencies can do as they
> wish.  The "militant, maverick attitude" only surfaces when people
> like you are being dealt with.  Have you not read the numerous post
> about assistance that people have received from members of the WKPP,
> they received no attitude.
> Speaking of respect, I have had some of you comments on rec.scuba sent
> to me unsolicited, people claim that you make as much of an ass of
> yourself there as you have on this list.  Do you really desire for me
> to prove that point Mr "I do not advocate anything above 1.6, but in
> the unlikely event that I got trapped with a higher mix, I know what I
> am dealing with" Black?  Do you know your nickname on rec.scuba is
> "Black the Quack"?
>
>>  I remain optimistic that you have much to contribute to dive
>> safety, but until you start presenting data in a thoughtful,
>> unobtrusive, and credible manner, your contributions will remain
>> confined to the small group of elitists you think you are.
>
> I don't think I am an elitist sir, I think I am lucky to dive with
> this team; which means I do not have to dive with people like
> yourself.
>
>>   Good luck with your continued research, I suspect you're going to
>> need it.
>
> Thank you, but luck has nothing to do with it.  Teamwork would be a
> good place to look however.
> I sir am done with you, and hope that most people by now have set up
> filters to block your nonsense.  However, you never did answer my
> question, What have you done for diving lately?
> Scott Hunsucker
>



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]