excellent use of bold face and italics, scoring: 9.5, 9.4, 9.6, 10.0, and 6.3 from the romanian judge............. regards, Al Marvelli PS Dr. Quack, shut the fuck up already. Scott Hunsucker wrote: > Dr. Black, > I said my last post to you would be my final one; however, I guess > I've fallen for the bait. > >> Don't have a knipshin, but there really is a credibility problem >> with your data. > > It is not my data, I did not do the calculations, I just presented the > information because that is where the thread took us. > >> And given the checkered past and present of your rogue's gallery of >> divers, there very likely will always be a credibility problem. > > Have you ever meet a member of the WKPP? The WKPP is composed of many > people, most of us are professionals, and everyone of us is quite nice > and willing to share information with those that ask. Our credibility > can lie on the track record of George and the team, sir. > >> You and your team are looking for respect, and guess what Adolph, >> you ain't gonna get it. > > I am not looking for respect as you put it, I am looking for new > cave. The Adolph commit was unnecessary and for all of those in the > world that lost loved ones due to Adolph, I sincerely hope you rot in > hell you pestilent, feeble minded bastard. > >> You say the world of diving medicine isn't ready for you and your >> team, when in truth the world of diving medicine would welcome your >> accomplishments if only they looked even half-way credible. > > Are you not an Ophthalmologist? How do you speak for the world of > diving medicine? They were not ready for us at that presentation > because they are conservative, they have to be. > >> You say "the WKPP has amassed an amazing safety record, all the >> while doing dives that no one else in the world does." So are we >> supposed to believe this too, just like we're supposed to believe >> that oxygen exposures up to 20,000 percent are safe? > > Why don't you pick up any magazine, watch any video, or talk to people > that cave dive, you will find your answers. You really must enjoy > this to continue to hold a failing position. I never said that > exceeding the "clock" was safe, I said we have done it somewhere > between 15,000 and 20,000 percent. I guess you have not done your > math or homework on this subject. > >> You are going to have to do a much better job of convincing the >> majority of disbelievers if you expect to get any kind of respect >> from the professional agencies you are so quick to chastise, and >> that very well might start with losing the militant, maverick >> attitude you so fondly cherish and display. > > I do not have to do anything but dive sir. I began all of this > posting so people might learn, yet I am too busy answering you to put > anything else out there. I dive for fun, the agencies can do as they > wish. The "militant, maverick attitude" only surfaces when people > like you are being dealt with. Have you not read the numerous post > about assistance that people have received from members of the WKPP, > they received no attitude. > Speaking of respect, I have had some of you comments on rec.scuba sent > to me unsolicited, people claim that you make as much of an ass of > yourself there as you have on this list. Do you really desire for me > to prove that point Mr "I do not advocate anything above 1.6, but in > the unlikely event that I got trapped with a higher mix, I know what I > am dealing with" Black? Do you know your nickname on rec.scuba is > "Black the Quack"? > >> I remain optimistic that you have much to contribute to dive >> safety, but until you start presenting data in a thoughtful, >> unobtrusive, and credible manner, your contributions will remain >> confined to the small group of elitists you think you are. > > I don't think I am an elitist sir, I think I am lucky to dive with > this team; which means I do not have to dive with people like > yourself. > >> Good luck with your continued research, I suspect you're going to >> need it. > > Thank you, but luck has nothing to do with it. Teamwork would be a > good place to look however. > I sir am done with you, and hope that most people by now have set up > filters to block your nonsense. However, you never did answer my > question, What have you done for diving lately? > Scott Hunsucker > -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]