Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:33:02 -0600
To: Steven Bliim <Steven.Bliim@Mc*.co*.au*>, techdiver@aquanaut.com
From: Scott Hunsucker <swhac@pc*.gu*.ne*>
Subject: RE: Pulmonary swelling
Steve,
    While I can't speak for Australia, I can speak for what might be 
construed as common sense.  If you are having problems getting O2 at high 
enough pressures to give you the volumes needed to meet you decompression 
needs, then why not switch to a larger volume, lower pressure 
cylinder.  This of course would allow you to have more O2 at pressures you 
can achieve (by cascade) and eradicate having to resort to using a gas that 
is less than optimal.
    The reference to buoyancy control is referring to one of the old 
arguments in favour of 80/20.  You could find that if you search the 
archives for "A Baker's Dozen" about 80/20.
    Oxygen here also comes at 180 bar.
Sincerely,
Scott Hunsucker

At 03:12 PM 02/18/2000 +1100, Steven Bliim wrote:
>Scott
>
>While I agree that 100% O2 is the optimal gas for decompression I might just
>suggest that another reason that 80% is used is related to the pressure at

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]