Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 05:50:44 -0500
From: trey@ne*.co* (Trey)
To: "Michael J. Black" <mjblackmd@ya*.co*>
CC: quiglem@ib*.ne*, Aquanaut Mail <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: Dry vs. Immersed pO2
Try 30 years ago in a total vacuum of reality. Take the fucking cotton
out of your ears, Black, and stick it in your mouth. Commercial and
military diving have long ago found far better answers to these
questions. The "agencies" do not want to make the transition to reality
due to the fact that they feel tehy will be liable for the deaths and
injuries already inflicted by this inane stupidity, but that will not
save them in court. 

Better information is out there, now shut the fuck up and listen to it.
I can not believe that you are any kind of "doctor". Do yo go to 30 year
old information when you research for a patient? Hello, Mike, anybody
home?

Take a seat.


Michael J. Black wrote:
> 
> Martin,
> 
> Do you know if the NOAA single exposures you have listed are
> based on research conducted on immersed divers, or divers in
> a dry chamber?  I do not dispute the effects of immersion and
> blood volume shifts, but I don't know exactly how NOAA arrived
> at these numbers, and have taken them for granted.
> 
> Thanks, MJB
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]