Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Martin M. Quigley" <quiglem@ib*.ne*>
To: "Michael J. Black" <mjblackmd@ya*.co*>
Cc: "Aquanaut Mail" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: RE: Dry vs. Immersed pO2
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2000 20:59:58 -0500
According to the NOAA Dive Manual(pp. 15-2 to 15-3) these recommendations
come from experiments at the NEDU (Panama City) by Butler and Thalmann
(Butler, FK, Jr. and ED Thalmann. 1986. Central nervous system oxygen
toxicity in closed circuit scuba divers II. Undersea Biomed Res
13(2):193-223) performed with "wet" divers.

There is huge individual variation in CNS oxygen toxicity, even in the same
individual from day to day. The NOAA guidelines are "conservative" in that
they are in line with industry experience and have "stood the test of time".
Remaining within these guidelines has resulted in a very low incidence of
CNS oxygen toxicity.

		Martin


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael J. Black [mailto:mjblackmd@ya*.co*]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2000 4:40 PM
> To: quiglem@ib*.ne*
> Cc: Aquanaut Mail
> Subject: Re: Dry vs. Immersed pO2
>
>
> Martin,
>
> Do you know if the NOAA single exposures you have listed are
> based on research conducted on immersed divers, or divers in
> a dry chamber?  I do not dispute the effects of immersion and
> blood volume shifts, but I don't know exactly how NOAA arrived
> at these numbers, and have taken them for granted.
>
> Thanks, MJB
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
> http://im.yahoo.com
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]