Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
This cheesedick has been blowing his bullshit all over rec.scuba, but spared the techlist for some reason.......probably because he knows he will get flamed into carbon here. MHK, Miranda, have all tried to be polite to the cheesedick, but he will have none of it. I can tell you *for sure*, if it came to taking sides on this issue, I side with Miranda and MHK. Miranda "Mad Dog" has a very good handle on these issue's, presents them with the utmost courtesy and intellect, in a very proper and lady like manner, and the good Doctor rejected her as an incompetent as well. So much for his complaints about delivery. I say we hang him off the coat rack by his nutsack. "Don't answer unless you have 1,000+ dives" he says to all and sundry. I also lit him up, several times, and he refuses to understand what he is proposing, and what un-initiated readers might gather from his post's, especially because he finds it important to include the "MD" title on his identity. Titles buy credibility, even when none is present, which only makes him more of a target. I ratted him off to GI, as ordered, and he sniveled about that. <snicker> Not to me, of course, not to the techlist, but to the crowd at rec.scuba. And tells everyone that he hopes a potential pony user is not swayed from their purchase by ill mannered, illiterate, uneducated ruffians like me. <compliments!> Plus, I cant make two sentences without the inclusion of *profanity*!!!!!! Well, no fucking shit. I say we kick his candied ass. Me first. (Billy W, here is an opening *begging* for attention) <snicker> Scott ----- Original Message ----- From: "MHK" <mhkane@pr*.ne*> To: "aquanaut" <techdiver@aquanaut.com> Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2000 5:01 PM Subject: Fw: Dr. Bennett's Nitrox article > I have copied a post that I have sent to rec. scuba, I have been going back > and forth over the last 2 weeks with Dr. Demento A.K.A. as Dr. MJB. > > It seems Dr. Demento believes that it is acceptable to use a P02 of 1.9, at > depth, in his * pony * bottle. As I have been unsuccessful in getting this > idiot to see the light of way I thought maybe some on this list may want to > take a shot at showing our dear doctor the error of his ways. > > > MJB, > > > > I gave you the perfect way to bow out gracefully, I said let sleeping dogs > > lie, but you decided to retort, once agin with your utter stupidity, so > now > > I am left with no choice but to, once again, point out your stupidity. > > > > > > > > You distorted the facts, and it is VERY TRUE that this needs to be > > > cleared up. I do not PLAN any dive to pO2 1.9. I often carry a > > > pony bottle with EAN40 and NEVER use it. > > > > No shit. You shouldn't use your pony. Your pony, in your own words, is > > used exclusively for bailout purposes, that's the only thing you said in > > that thread that made sense. But where you utterly failed in your > planning, > > despite your arrogant and condescending request that only diver's withh > > 1,000+ plus respond, is that you CLEARLY stated that you would be diving > to > > an MOD of 130', once again, your words not mine. You also pontificated > that > > you suggest that a 40% mix is what you recommend using in your pony. > > > > 40% at 130' yeilds an P02 of 1.9. Absent all your other condesending, > > medicinal bullshit, that is the most ridiculous planning I have ever heard > > of. By your own admission, you will only use your pony in and emergency > > situation, you then arrogantly suggest that in said emergency, that 1.9 is > > acceptable. What the hell is your logic???? > > > > What have you gained by excedding the recommended PP02's by such a large > > measure??? > > > > Hint: You gain ABSOLUTELY NOTHING and you risk oxygen toxicity. > > > > Now from what I gather, you believe that you possess a working knowledge > of > > OxTox because rather than defend your stupidity you entertained us with > some > > irrelevant post citing inapplicable information respecting OxTox. > > > > So rather than quote some bullshit, tell everyone reading this thread, > your > > colleague Dr. Bennett included, why you recommend breathing a mix of 1.9 > in > > emergency situations???? > > > > No other doctorial nonsense, cite facts, authority and reasoning... > > > > Stop misdirecting the question and just answer it. I've asked it, Miranda > > has asked it and Scott has asked it and you have FAILED to answer it, > citing > > your high and mighty belief that you *know the risks and have accepted > > them*. Who gives a shit what you think you know, if you are recommending > > something to someone else, they have a right to know why. When a patient > > comes into your office and you recommend treatment and they question why > do > > you just tell that that you have evaluated *there* risk or do you explain > > why???? > > > > > > It is there for bailout > > > only. Most wrecks I dive are in 130ffw or less. I do not PLAN to > > > breathe my pony at this depth, but if I have to I will, and I know > > > to get the hell outa there. My PLAN calls for breathing air. > > > > Your plan sucks!!!!!! > > > > > Your misunderstanding of pulmonary vs CNS oxygen toxicity was clearly > > > evident to me when you questioned the statement about breathing > > > a 1.6 mix for 45 minutes to reach 100% on the CNS clock. I have a > > > feeling you understand the concept better now. > > > > > > You idiot you still don't get it... Who the hell is talking about OTU's, > we > > are talking about convulsing because your P02's are too high... > > > > Do some homework, study the issue and then talk to me about pulmonary -v- > > CNS. You are a complete contradiction in terms. Even Dr. Bennett's > > article emphasized the fact that P02's need to be lowered, so you are > > defending him, agreeing with him, but arguing with me that you can breathe > > 1.9 for 45 minutes. No wonder why HMO's are taking over the medical > > profession. > > > > Did you go to medical school in Guatemala??? > > > > > > > Neither, see above. I must say that I do find it very interesting > > > based on DAN's data from 1996 that the incidence of DCI with Nitrox > > > is twice that of air. > > > > Once again, and this is a record even for you, you missed the point. The > > stats are WAY OFF. There is NOTHING about these stats that can be relied > > upon. They are meaningless, but you are to blind or to arrogant to see > it. > > They are comparing apples to oranges. > > > > I have never subscribed to the notion that > > > Nitrox is "safer" than air, and the statistics are beginning to show > > > this. It is evident to me that as we push the envelope with this > > > mixed gas diving, unless we understand it better, we are walking a > > > very fine line. > > > > *We* aren't walking any such fine line. *We* study it, *We* understand it > > and *We* are successful diving it. You keep clinging to 1.9 and then > > question why the stats are so high. What an idiot...... > > > > Why in God's name would you pontificate about using 1.9 and then dare to > > suggest that Nitrox is more dangerous than air. If it is, it's because of > > idiots like you that don't have a god damn clue what they are talking > about, > > dive dangerous mixes and then arrogantly defend stupidity. > > > > If they stats support more danger it is because of you........ > > > > Later > > > > > > > > -- > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]