Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:16:55 -0500
To: tgunther@co*.co*
From: Jarrod Jablonski <jjcave@ib*.ne*>
Subject: Re: SAMPLE DECO DIVE - 220 FOR 25
Cc: decoplan@gu*.co*, quest@gu*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
I did not test them against these per se. I have been using this or our
Hamilton modifications for several years so I am not familiar enough
(outside of how they work for teaching purposes) to give you good
comparisons. With enough tweaking you can make a lot of schedules look very
much alike. The question is largely the amount of tweaking and the
consistency of the schedules. As for the gradient method I know that GAP
uses them but am not aware of others. 

JJ

At 06:41 AM 1/12/00 -0800, tgunther@co*.co* wrote:
>If I can could pick your mind further, in producing Deco Planner did you
test it
>against Abyss, Voyager, Z-plan, etc, and if so, how do they compare?   Are
the
>results similiar?    Do these other products also use m-values and
>gradient-factors, or is your algorthym a completely different approach to
>decompression?
>
>Thanks as always,
>Tod
>
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: quest-unsubscribe@gu*.co*
>For additional commands, e-mail: quest-help@gu*.co*
> 



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]