Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <Gilldiver@ao*.co*>
Date: Sun, 5 Dec 1999 09:36:49 EST
Subject: Re: sandblasting tanks
To: cam_banks@ho*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
 
>  Finally sandblasted it with 30 mesh sand at 100psi from a home compressor, 
>  and got a nice finish not unlike the "bead blasted" finish now available 
on 
>  Luxfer aluminum 80's.
>  
>  So, what's the consensus here? Shall I condemn my tank, get it re-hydroed, 
>  or just continue on as usual?  Don't think I took off much aluminum, 
>  relative to the tank thinkness, nor did I get the tank hot. I'm inclined 
to 
>  go on using the tank, but open to other opinions.  Thanks.

What you did by any of these blast or abrasion methods was remove all of the 
anodize on the surface. Now the tanks will show a surface corrosion in very 
little time. You could have then re-anodized but it will cost you. At best 
get a good aluminum primer and top coat on as soon as posable. Also step up 
your visual inspection of the tank surface for any pitting under the paint. 
If there are any deep pits - check with the tank manufacturer for the max 
allowed, scrap the tank.

As for the surface morphology of the metal, the sand blast has forced silicon 
(and anything else that was mixed in the sand) inclusions into the surface of 
the aluminum which will reduce the fatigue life. If this was an aircraft, you 
would have just scrapped the part. For an aluminum tank there shouldn't be a 
problem as the fatigue loading is low (lets face it we just do not cycle a 
tank much more then 100-150 time a year unless you are doing training).

In the future use a nonacid chemical stripper or plastic media (I recommend 
type 5). Here is why:

Chemical strippers:

Most strippers use methylene chloride as the active chemical. Methylene 
chloride is one of the best strippers ever used but it has been declared a 
Hazardous Air Pollutant (HAP) by the EPA and as such is being restricted. You 
just may not be able to get it much longer. As an alternative the stripper 
manufacturers are changing to Benzoic Acid as the base. Benzoic acid may/can 
cause hydrogen embritlement and stress corrosion in high strength steels. 
Therefor it should never be used on steel tanks. So unless you can remember 
that the new acid strippers ARE NOT TO BE USED ON STEEL TANKS, do not use 
them at all.

Media Blast

The aircraft industry has been forced away from using methylene chloride by 
the EPA for the past 2-3 years. The current restriction is 55 gallons of HAP 
containing stripper per air frame (that's for a piper or a 747!) for use on 
parts that cannot presently be stripped by other methods. The alternative for 
aircraft is Plastic Media Blast (PMB). The Type 5 media currently used will 
not remove anodize and by adjustment of media flow and air pressure can be 
used on aircraft skins as thin as 0.02".

So, now that you have done it, check for corrosion and do it differently in 
the future.


Peter Johnson
Senior Manufacturing Engineer
Sikorsky Aircraft
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]