Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <kirvine@sa*.ne*>
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 21:35:03 -0500
To: bigvon@be*.ne*
CC: gordonjr <jrgordonsenior@em*.ms*.co*>, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: its about going deep george
Again, I live here, I dive here , and that has been true for years.
Again, you are full of shit.

We have been over this - 80's with a wetsuit, but then after trying this
once or twice I am not that stupid anymore, since the bottom can be so
cold as to kill the dive off completely and so I wear a drysuit with
either type tanks - al or steels.

The insulation is C-2, not the C-4 for that purpose. Other than items
idiosycratic to ocean diving being added in to the mix, nothing is
different.

You have never done a real dive in your life, and certainly nothing on
the order of what I do for exposures, you do not have a fraction of my
decompression knowledge or data, and are talking out of your ass in this
regard, once again.

Look at the Britannic URL's I put out, and round up those guys and tell
them they could not have done the dives they did , or watch the TV show.
Bill ( Von, or whatever yor name is) - you have no clue what you are
talking about on any subject on this list so far - you have a perfect
track record.


bigvon@be*.ne* wrote:
> 
> Obviously George you have never made a deep dive in the summer in the
Caribbean
> or you would understand.
> You still have not posted your tank/gas configuration diving wet w/out
scooter at
> 300 much less 350, for 25 to 30 min..
> What are you so afraid of?
> That there is an instant when DIR might not be exactly as the great George
> Grapevine dictates?
> DIR does work in most instances. However there might, just might be an
> alternative that is safer for the longer exposures at depth. i.e. redundant
bc'
> for gas availability.
> By the way, studies have shown that one long exposure may be safer than two
> shorter ones.
> Von
> kirvine@sa*.ne* wrote:
> 
> > Bill, you are not only dangerous ,you are an outright liar. There is no
> > ocean on this planet where the water at "350" is warm. The Britannic is
> > cold as would be expected at depth and warm at the surface as would be
> > expected in the Mediteranean. Your original argument was that the Gulf
> > is warm at the surface. The fact is you have no justification for
> > dangerous stupidity.
> >
> > An unbalanced rig is open ocean the trademeark of a no-plan dillatante.
> > This is so simple, and you do not get it. Convoluted stupidity to offset
> > self-inflicted risk is not the answer.
> >
> > I will keep offsetting your nonsense and pointing out how wrong you are.
> > The difference betwen you and the guys who did the Britannic is the
> > diffrence between the real thing and bullshit. Jarrod is the real thing,
> > you are a yapping pretender.
> >
> > Your other argument is that we do not "know wreck diving". Well, Big
> > Time, that is obviously not the case, and the fact is that it makes no
> > difference where the dive is, our methods are used by the successful
> > divers, the bullshit is what the bullshitters use. You are in the latter
> > category.
> >
> > bigvon@be*.ne* wrote:
> > >
> > > Like I said before George you are a master of misdirection. The discussion
> > > was about deep warm water diving with steels without the use of a
scooter..
> > > Not cold Britannic water with drysuits and scooters.
> > > You still did not answer the question tough guy and I doubt you ever will.
> > > Von
> > >
> > > kirvine@sa*.ne* wrote:
> > >
> > > > Von, why don't you stop by GUE and straighten Jarrod out. I tried to
> > > > tell him that diving the Britannic in a drysuit was not the Von method,
> > > > and that since he was beyond 300, he should have had steels and a
> > > > wetsuit, a backwards bc, two bottom timers in case his arm got bit off
> > > > by a shark, etc.
> > > >
> > > > Maybe you can come to a WKPP dive and tell me how to do more than a
> > > > "bounce" dive, since I have very little experience with the kind of big
> > > > bottom times you are doing, and show me about "exploring" and what I
> > > > need to do in the way of "modifications " to accomplish these feats,
> > > > short of the lobotomy is appears you forgot to tell us about.
> > > >
> > > > bigvon@be*.ne* wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I did laugh at THAT one.
> > > > > I realize I am on the "DIR list", not techdiver. I will continue to
> > > > > dive my way and you guys can stay above 300 and dive your way. No one
> > > > > has addressed the deep issue. I am not advocating deep diving, just
> > > > > commenting on a style that is safe. You WKPP guys keep bouncing the
> > > > > wrecks and we will keep exploring them.
> > > > > Von
> > > > >
> > > > > gordonjr wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >      Von, You place your backup wing on upside down, strap the
> > > > >      inflator to your waist strap, and orally inflate at waist
> > > > >      level?Hell, if I could do that I'd never leave the house
> > > > >      (credits to G.Carlin). JR Gordon   "Just flip the BC over
> > > > >      and place it over the bolts as you do your primary B.C.
> > > > >      I loop a small loop of small bungie over the bottom bolt
> > > > >      before I assemble the
> > > > >      harness. This loop is placed over the  power inflator
> > > > >      mechanism to secure it at
> > > > >      your right waist. There is no hose run to the inflator. Just
> > > > >      orally inflate if
> > > > >      needed."
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> > > > Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]