Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <kirvine@sa*.ne*>
Date: Sun, 14 Nov 1999 15:51:09 -0500
To: bigvon@be*.ne*
CC: ajmarve@ba*.ne*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Laughingstock again
I have done it with double 80's and wetsuit, with 40 cu deco bottles,
but then I did not stay 30 minutes at 350 because the deco would be more
than makes any sense in the Gulfstream for reasons already discussed on
here. Yes I have had situations where the dive got carried away and I
paid the price of having to do a long deco, but in those cases there was
no current, and we were straight up and down with no weather or shipping
problems - in other wors, we got lucky and we did not do ikt again. Most
of the time, this is not too smart, and I would not plan it that way.
This is to be avoided.

I seriously doubt a slob like you did 350 for 30 - I am sure you think
you did after telling yourself that, but I really doubt it. 30 minutes
to me means I get to the bottom and start counting that  30 minutes ,
and then stop counting when I leave the bottom - you probably start the
count at the surface and continue back to the first deco stop. Well, at
60 fpm decent, and 33 fpm ascent, there is a quick 12 minutes of nothing
that you call "bottom time". I call that an 18 minute bottom time . I
really doubt a stroke like you could do even 5 minutes at "350" with
anything but a CCR. I dive long dives at 300 on O/C and know exactly
what the gas consumption and deco requirements are, you do not. I burn a
stage at 300 for longer than any bottom time you ever did in your life
at that depth, and I will guarantee that. I have done at least 3 times
as many deep wreck dives as any kind of cave dive, and I know that game
cold. You do not, and your "shark attack" "350 for 30" attempts at
impressing us spell that out quite clearly - a wannabe with an attitude.

I have never used my scooter for dives this deep in the ocean - I do not
want to risk it. JJ has with his, but then he had more ground to cover
and he knows the guy who makes them if they break. You can criticize my
scooter diving when you have ANY CLUE what you are talking about, or
when you can swim with me, Bill - that is a sure Macy's window bet - a
100% for sure.

I did find out it was cold(er) at that depth ( anything beyond 150
really), so most every other time I did it, I used the drysuit and I
still used the 40's. I have done it with both 104's and with 80's -
there was no change in any of the configuration other than that I
inflated the suit with a smaller bottle and it was on my hip, not my
tanks, and my pressure guage had a larger clip on it thah my cave rig
does, as do my ocean deco bottles for when I need the gloves. 

With many of the 80's dives, I also used an 80 stage of bottom gas. The
aluminum 40's were on my hip, and the oxygen was either brought down to
me when I got to 20 feet, or I used an aluminum 30 taken with me , also
on the hip. 

What an idiot like you can not get through his thick head is that the
rig NEEDS TO BE BALANCED. That means that the tanks need to be offset in
such a manner that you can get up WIOTHOUT THE BC AT ALL, as in hose
failure, gas failure, reg failure, bc failure, etc., and only the worst
idiot would use double bc's that introduce a whole new set of ridiculous
convolution and potential problems, not to mention bungees or restricted
wings, when such a simple solution exists and makes more sense. You
can't see the whole picture , Bill, but you sure have a huge mouth that
keeps on yapping anyway with how to fix self-imposed problems with more
problems. With a shell suit and insulation, steel will work that way by
dropping the light - leaving you with only a small negative amount to
compensate for, and at the depth you are talking, that means a very
small if any amount since that means heavy trimix - much lighter than
air. Yes you do need a light, Bill, and somebody else can tell you all
the reasons why tha never crossed your little stroke mind.

With a wetsuit, steel tanks are just plain stupid, like everything else
you say on here. Aluminum 80's with one aluminum 80 stage are like
having 104's gaswise, and yet represent no risk in the weight category.
A smarter choice. You do not need 80 deco bottles unless you have
emphasema and then you should not be diving, and if your gas consumption
at deco is THIS bad, you do not need to be at 350, and certainly could
not stay there lonmg enough to need to big deco bottles in the first
place - a mutually exclusive bullshit argumenmt on your part one more
time, and no, you do not need any "redundent " deco gas because all of
your gases will work despite the old wives tales to the contrary and the
safety crew on the boat will be checking you at some point and bring
down any extra needed gas, unless of course you do not have one, and
then you will have to hope your buddies are not slobs and hoovers and
that they have a little extra to pass on to you, which is usually the
case, or that you even have buddies at all.

In fact the last time I did a really deep wreck dive at 430 feet, one of
the geniuses on the boat clipped one of his deco bottles off to the
buoyed line I was pulling on the way down, and it boogied. I had to
share with him until the divemaster got down to us.  

Wetsuits compress to paper at depth and provide no thermal protection or
lift, and if you really did anything but yap , you would know this. On
air, you would not notice because you would be stoned to the bone and
loving it.

Look, idiot - nothing you say makes any sense, you are dangerous in my 
opinion both in substance and attitude, and you are wasting everyone's
time - the whole list understands these concepts, and you do not, and
you never will. Try Rec scuba where "350 for 30" and "shark attacks"
will make you a big shot, or buy a CCR and go on that list. Here you are
a laughing stock to ther real world, and a petty little restentful
stroke, like os many othes "big timers" who get no respect because they
have earned disrespect with their own stupidity and have put it in
writing, like you have, one more time.

bigvon@be*.ne* wrote:
> 
> If you want to discuss my posts then at least answer the question I posted to
you and you refused to
> answer, tough guy.
> 
> Tell me your configuration for a warm water (non-dry suit) open ocean dive to
350' for 25-30 min.
> without a scooter.
> Of course you will do it with your double aluminum's and five stages because
you do not use steels
> in the ocean. I want to see you swim with THAT configuration. Oh I forgot,
you have stated that you
> do not make long deco ocean dives....wonder why?.....?
> Or are you so addicted to scooters that you can't make this dive?
> This is an instance when steels are the logical choice for capacity and
redundant BC's are the
> logical safety choice.
> Get a life George.
> Von
> 
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]