matt re-read what i said - do i mention either? i am talking of his concept of risk assumption -only. i stated that i was not getting into the "what's better or worse argument". hank In a message dated 11/04/1999 11:15:44 AM Eastern Standard Time, mbloedorn@ya*.co* writes: << Hank, Are you referring to actual sidemounting. IE two stages clipped on each side, or are you referring to independant doubles? There is a definite difference.... Mat. --- GarlooEnt@ao*.co* wrote: > sean > i am not going to get into a long discussion about > your concept of side & ID > diving. > > i only have one point to make & i agree with you > entirely on this -- > YOU CHOSE to accept the additional assumption of > risk -when it is deemed to > be acceptable to you?? > so how is it you can't accept the possibility that > others (that may have more > experience than you or anyone you might know) CHOSE > to accept the additional > assumption of risk FOR THEMSELVES?? > > thanks hank >> -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]