Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <kirvine@sa*.ne*>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 1999 18:22:32 -0400
To: John Chluski <undersea@ga*.ne*>
CC: Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*>, Andrew.Cohen@no*.go*,
     techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Fwd:Update on August Expedition to Monitor NMS
John, do you think NOAA could bring up the "Doria" while they are at it? 

John Chluski wrote:
> 
> Jim,
> 
> Relax and get your facts from accurate sources, not just from a TV news
> segment.  $20 million is more than the entire yearly budget for the
> administration for
> all of NOAA's marine sanctuaries (about 14 million in 1997) and was the
> estimate for bringing the wreck up which is obviously not realistic.
> 
> While you and a few other tax payers who have the skills to visit the site
> would prefer to leave the artifacts where they are, consider for a moment
> that on any given day there are more tax payers who visit the Monitor
> collection at the museum than the total number of divers who have ever
> visited the site.  Civil War buffs (taxpayers too) probably only out number
> tech divers about 5,000 to 1 (guestimate).
> 
> Last year's expedition was used to a large extent for the Navy's salvage
> divers to train on a new mixed gas surface supplied system.  Perhaps they
> should have just spent tax payer dollars on sand dives instead...
> 
> The work up dives are primarily for NOAA/NURC/NURP divers who have seen that
> open circuit provides a more cost effective method of conducting marine
> archeology than surface supplied or submersible operations under certain
> conditions.  Should this rationale offend you I would suggest that you could
> save more tax dollars by squawking at Wood's Hole, Harbour Branch, Scripp's,
> etc.  The intital training for the divers involved in this year's project
> was provided at no cost to you or any other tax payers and involved
> significant time and expense on the part of many volunteers.  Perhaps
> instead of a rational methodology of training, they should just have jumped
> in and dove the Monitor without work up dives.
> 
> Judging by your comments, I take it that you are completely against the
> recovery of any artifacts...  and have never been involved in any project
> that has recovered artifacts...  and thus support a current resolution
> before the UN that would effectively make it very difficult for anyone to
> dive most wrecks.  Personally, I prefer to see the artifacts where they are,
> but I also recognise that I am not the only tax payer who would have an
> interest in such things.   And just maybe an artifact found today sitting on
> the sand was not there yesterday and will not be there tomorrow...
> 
> So instead of ransacking all marine museums to throw all the collections
> back into the sea, perhaps we can chill a little and see that your $0.02 and
> my $0.02 amounts to a total of $0.04...
> 
> Personally, I like the Monitor web site.  I like your trimix site too and
> have found it useful.  I would suspect, however, that there may be more
> people who are more interested in the Monitor site due to its significance
> to naval history and the Civil War.  Not on this list perhaps, but the
> world is a little bigger than techdiver@aquanuat.com.
> 
> Regards, John
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*>
> To: John Chluski <undersea@ga*.ne*>; Andrew Cohen
<Andrew.Cohen@no*.go*>;
> Tech Diver <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
> Date: Saturday, August 14, 1999 5:28 PM
> Subject: Re: Fwd:Update on August Expedition to Monitor NMS
> 
> >Hey, John, I don't know about you, but I am a diver and I prefer to see
> >my artifacts underwater and not on dry land. And it is particularly
> >galling to see $20,000,000.00 of my tax dollars going into the "eliminate
> >the monitor" project. By the way, that web site is really lame, glad to
> >see that they are not pissing away the money on a wasteful decent web
> >site. They are saving it to be used for rigorous "work-up dives" to the
> >Proteus. Oh, my what scientific research. What a scam. Another
> >pork-barrel project to benefit the few and paid for by the many.
> >
> >   Jim
> >
> >Sender: John Chluski  Date: 8/14/99 4:33 AM
> 
> --
> Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
> Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]