I understood from several conversations with one of the individuals, that this dive was a prep/raining dive for a deep expedition planned for this summer with depth in the 450~520 fsw range. One individual stated that his depth gauge read 297 fsw and he had not brought his other two. Hmmm This helps to validate Jim's statement of depth. R/David -----Original Message----- From: listowner@ci*.co* [mailto:listowner@ci*.co*]On Behalf Of Capt JT Sent: Saturday, May 08, 1999 10:18 PM To: Jim Cobb Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com; vbtech@ci*.co* Subject: Re: Lake Jocassee Incident At 09:48 PM 5/8/99 -0400, you wrote: >> >Something else I have learned... The very experienced diver he was with >reported a depth of 298' on his depth gauge but told the investigator his >plan was 190', on air. Hmmmmm. Jim where did you hear this , I have heard it rumored.Does anyone else know of this , can anyone confirm this to be true , if it is true then it is a false report , why would someone make false statements to an official investigator ? << Send subscribe/unsubscribe/help requests to VBTech-request@ci*.co* >> -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]