Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 00:21:02 -0500
From: Karen Flynn <"kflynn1@er*.co*"@erols.com>
To: Christina Young <christina@ch*.co*>
CC: techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Shipwrecks/UNESCO in General
Christina,

Couldn't agree more!!! Sign me up now for my "Ph.D in Underwater 
Archeaeology for just $19.95 from Christina Young University". I've got 
a bunch of "Continuing Education Credits", so I should be able to 
graduate in no time. If you ever get to the Baltimore area, you're 
welcome to stop by and see my collection from the "E. M. Clark", and 
others...

Seriously though, what bothers me most about the UNESCO concern, is that 
we don't need to look very far to understand the ramifications of having 
large bueraucratic organizations handling issues of shipwrecks.  You 
only need to look at the "USS Monitor" site as an example...

Don't get me wrong, I believe there are some wrecks out there deserving 
of protection.  I agree with the original philosophy that initiated the 
creation of the "USS Monitor" wreck site as a sanctuary.  Clearly an 
historic, unprecedented time capsule from the Civil War.  However, 
initially NOAA made it nearly impossible for fully qualified wreck 
divers to access the site.  Then, with the expansion of tech diving in 
the mid-90s they allowed the "general public" on the wreck for the first 
time through the "Special Use Permit" program.  Now after 4 years, it 
looks as though that "public access" program is coming to an end.  And 
if memory severs me correctly - the Sanctuary program mission is:

“to provide maximum public access to marine resources, while at the same 
time, protecting those resources for future generations through a 
comprehensive stewartship program”; John Broadwater, Monitor Sanctuary 
Manager

I don't see any reason for having large bureaucratic or governmental 
organizations getting involved in general/non-historic shipwreck 
protection.  Worst yet, when the wreck site truely does deserve 
oversight, it's not clear to me that the "vision" of what they want to 
accomplish with that oversight is understood.  And I believe the NOAA 
involvment in the "oversight" of the USS Monitor site is proof of that. 
 
Maybe with my new "Ph.D in Underwater Archeaeology", I'll at least be 
able to get a Research Permit for the Monitor....

Karen
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]