Phi, No I don't own any dive computers, I don't understand the damn things - it's bad enough with the box on my desk - don't really understand that. I can understand your point with wrecks and things, having your depth changing and things, but I find that the tables method works best, it also means that I spend longer in the water which is quite a relief to my arthritis. If I spend less than 25 minutes on oxygen, then I sometimes have trouble getting back into the boat, what with the weight of all the cylinders and things. I think the saying goes "You can't teach an old dog new tricks." Regards, Peter -----Original Message----- From: Phi Le [SMTP:PLe@Se*.co*] Sent: Thursday, January 07, 1999 3:09 PM To: Peter Stubley; 'techdiver@aquanaut.com' Cc: Ranjit Chagar; 'Geoff Mullard' Subject: RE: Nitek3, Nemesis IIa Warts and All Peter, No doubt I fully agree with you on trimix or square-shape profile dives, tables are best. But don't you think there are instances when you dive on a sloppy reef, or on wrecks where you are constantly at different depths to explore or find artifacts, a computer gives better NDL ? Do you cut table for every single dive you make ? And you don't own any computer at all ? Phi -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]