Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Zero, explain one of these rigs to us , and the logic of that rig. I do not want to hear vague references to something - I want a rig. The light is bullshit - why have a clunky, non-focusable light ( useless as a signalling device) or for looking distances that hangs off of you danging or is a weight in your hand that you can not use and use your hand at the same time. All the parts of the lights are replaceable in an instant, and the small ones burn 40-60 minutes - enough for a wreck dive. We use backup lights on the harness that are twist on 3- C cell. Zero, why not have gear and a config that stays the same while working in all situations, rather than a limited config that will not? Why not have a standard set of emergency responses that work for everyone? Some anonomous character sent me a private saying that our system is not "self sufficient". He is wrong: we are both self sufficient and buddy divers - we have both . He did not bother to tell me what system is more "self suffeicient" than ours, nor can he and have it make any sense. CAPTZEROOO@ao*.co* wrote: > > No one is saying your wrong. The DIR methods work & as your team has shown > work well. You are all to be commended for this. > > The problem some of us have with YOU & DIR is your insistance that DIR is THE > ONLY WAY to dive right. There can be more than one right way. Diffrent people > can dive diffrent rigs with sucsess. > > One of the key questions here is how do you define sucess. very few (no) > organazation of wreck or Rec. divers does the dives your team does, so it is > hard to get a good comparrison. I have been diving my sytem on wrecks off of > boats anchored to wrecks for over 2000. dives with great results and sucses. > But does my 2000 dives in the ocean on wrecks really compare to your whole > team in caves. not really, a lot of the diving physics and physiology are the > same but not the types of dives being done. That would not be a fair or > logical conparison. > > We would need to find a more level apples to apples comparison to really pit > one sagainst another. I think that these inherent diffrences are part of what > is causing the friction. plus that deaded phrase "personal prefrence" I like > a good Uk 800, 1200 aqua sun dive light over the ones your team, uses. I do > not need the kind of burn time you do 50 - 60 min is enough for me. I like a > simpler light because if some thing breaks on my light or does not seem right > before I jump in, I grab another out of my box and roll over the side. With no > scooter or reel lines to worry about having the light in my hand works well > Albiet in MY situation With my type of diving. If one of my fares needs a > light I can just hand one to him with out having to intergrate it into his > rig. Again a diffrent application. > > I belive that the diffrences in applications is part of what makes it so hard > to compare sytems. How do we correct or allow for these diffrences when > comparing gear ?? > > Please no flames just earnst replys > > Captain Zero > Member EDBA -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]