Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1998 10:14:34 -0500
To: gwaw@ix*.ne*.co*
From: Joel Silverstein <joelsilverstein@wo*.at*.ne*>
Subject: 80% arrrgh!! was Re: On the left
Cc: Techdiver@aquanaut.com
Dear Arnie, 

It is quite easy to pump 100% oxygen to 3000 psi -- the dive shop needs to
make the investment in a proper oxygen service rated Haskel Gas booster.
Most any reputable dive center who is mixing gas for the consumer should
have one, anyone that does not should step up pet the pony and buy one. 

80% EAN was not created from a decompression standpoint it was justified by
those who did not have a gas booster. Here's why. Oxygen gets delivered in
2400 psi bottles, (some major cities have gas suppliers who can supply at
3500 psi) however you can cascade into a 3000 psi rated cylinder about 2250
psi of oxygen top up to 3k with air and you have 80% oxygen content. Simple
enough.  However .......

80% EAN limits you severely. 1. at 20 and 10 fsw its PPO2  is too low make
it useful, at 40 fsw its too high for maximum exposure limits. 

10 fsw 1.04 po2  too low 
20 fsw 1.28 po2  too low
30 fsw 1.53 po2  borderline
40 fsw 1.77 po2  too high

Where as 100% oxygen is 

10 fsw 1.30 po2
20 fsw 1.61 po2

(with the 10 fsw stop normally being taken at 20 fsw 

Advocates of the EAN80 (a/k/a stroke mix) have come up with a variety of
reasons to justify not using 100% oxygen --- one of the great ones is "its
good for divers who have trouble holding buoyancy at 10 and 20 fsw"
frankly if a technical diver cant hold a 20 fsw stop --- they should go
bowling and get the hell out of the water. 

Most divers who are using accelerated decompression tables have
standardized on their decompression mixes.  (some are finding that
hyperoxginated heliox mixes are working well too though that is beyond the
scope of this email) 

EAN 36 from 110 fsw 
EAN 50 from 70 fsw 
100% oxygen from 20 fsw

Granted when you run one of the consumer dive profiling softwares you may
see only a small decrease in decompression time -- maybe 5 minutes by using
100% over EAN80. and though you may belive that is not a significant enough
advantage to make sure you have 100% oxygen here are a few more
non-scientific reasons.  From a mixing standpoint unless you are using
exceptionally clean hyper filtrated air or air produced from an oil free
compressor there is risk of explosion when mixing high pressure air on top
of 100% oxygen. It probably has not happened yet --- but some day some
goober will blow up a building doing it. Even if you are using a 30 cuber
(small) just cascading 2400 psi oxygen in it will give you 24 cuft of
oxygen -- for deco thats easily 40 minutes worth, which is a lot of gas. No
need to goober around making EAN80 for the other 6 cuft, its just too much
work for it and I am sure it costs a bit more, besides if you are doing a
dive that requires much more than 40 minutes of oxygen decompression you
would want a bigger tank. The fact that a tank has a pressure rating of
3000 does not mean you have to fill it to that level. I have an excellent
tank chart for all currently available tanks in the US on our web site - go
look at it. Next; most consumer available oxygen analyzers using
electrochemical sensors can be off by as much as 2% in their readings, so
is your 80% really 80 or is it 78? Whereas pure oxygen is upwards of 99%
pure -- it's a known item. 

Arnie, as a techie in training you have an opportunity right in front of
you. It's two roads ... the left road is filled with exploration,
friendships, technology and long proven safety procedures. The right road
is bumpy, full of mis answered questions, body bags, and strokified
convolution. I get the feeling your want to take the high road and do it
right. In Judaic studies we are taught to ask why not to follow blindly.
So in this very long winding response (If I had more time it would have
been shorter) the answer is .... EAN80 buys you 6 cuft more gas, but buys
you nothing else. Take no shortcuts when it comes to technical diving. 

Good Luck 







At 10:21 PM 11/22/1998 -0800, you wrote:
>Joel,
>
>Another question for you.  It is prompted by your post on the bottle
>marking issue. 
>
>What is the advantage of 100% O2 compared to 80% O2.  I've been using
>the latter for deco.  For one, it is somewhat easier to get at local
>dive shops because it is harder to pump the 100% to 3,000 psi, but that
>is merely convenience.  More importantly, I can get on the 80% at 30ft
>and have the advantage of breathing a higher gradient gas mix sooner
>than waiting to the 20ft stop.  The published tables I've seen give no
>time advantage to doing deco on 100% over 80%. 
>
>What is your view and why?  TIA.
>
>Blow gentle bubbles,
>
>Arnie 
>Tech Diver in Training
>
Joel Silverstein
Scuba Training + Travel Co.
http://www.NitroxDiver.com
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]