Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

To: techdiver@opal.com
Subject: consequences
From: "Christopher A. Brown" <chbrown@fr*.sc*.fs*.ed*>
Cc: chbrown@fr*.sc*.fs*.ed* (Christopher A. Brown)
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 94 9:10:06 18000
I'm very happy to see tech divers discussing the consequences of our
activities. The recent discussions are certainly worth consideration
since we are the folks who are making these dives. Looking at the
results of what you do is a sign of some sensitivity and
maturity.Something that, in my experience, most right-wing types
reject. Witness the destruction and gross exploitation of any
environment that "I want mine... screw the rest of you..." types have
wrought on this planet. Surely the preservationists will be remembered
and honored long after the "rape loot and plunder" types have
departed. I hope some members of the wreck diving community never
become cave divers: "ooh look! Cool!" SMASH, WHACK, GRAB!  Please, not
in my lifetime.
When it becomes necessary to ID a wreck by retrieveing a part, that is
a valid move. But beyond that nothing much is accomplished. It takes
much more skill and many more brain cells to use a camera properly
than it does to use a crow bar. Perhaps that's too much to ask from
some people. Maybe the crow bar serves a penis extender (or
substitute, for those who didn't get one), and anyway the exertion,
combined with the obsession to come back with a trophy to prove" I was
there, really", is more likely to get you bent than simply taking
pictures (which by the way can be spread around and shared much more
than a large chunk of metal.)
About museums: not all institutions have the resources to conserve
artifacts. This is an expensive , time-consuming process. Also some
items do not fit with the guiding principal of a particular museum.
Museums don't just collect anything and everything, and cannot show
everything in a collection at once. What is shown needs interpretaion,
which includes research, conservation of the item (for posterity,
remember?), and space to create an exhibit which tells the visitor
something. All of this costs time and money. Maybe one expects all
government institutions to do this for us. You willing to payMORE
TAXES to cover the cost? Any idea how much it would cost to raise,
conserve, and display the monitor? Any idea why NOAA tried so hard to
keep crowbar types off the sight? So those who have the consideration
to just take pictures would have something to see, and share with the
rest of us.
When a diver retrieves an artifact that has historical/informational
value, it is not too difficult to find an institution that would be
interested. The American Association of Museums in Wash. DC can
provide you with a list of appropriate museums, such as submarine
museums, and maritime museums. AAM: ph:202-289-1818, fax: 202-289-6578.
To get information about preserving metal and wood ( so such things
don't just deteriorate while resting on top of your commode, you can
ask for a list of conservation labs who handle such things.  The
Museum of Florida History has one of the best labs in the world,
handling very large, old cannon, firearms, ceramics, wood, etc. They
are paid by the taxpayer , you and me, to make sure there is something
left for the rest of us to learn from.ph: 904-487-2299.
It takes just a little time to have some consideration for others. If
this message was too boring, or used too many braincells to think
about then by all means, please keep your head firmly inserted in your
rectum. That will keep the damage you do to a minimum.
-- 
Christopher A. Brown
 Sci-Graphica Public Relations/DOCENT FILMS
 Tallahassee FL 32311
chbrown@fr*.fs*.ed*
p904-877-4385,f904-656-1355
The winner is not the guy who dies with the most toys -- it's his
widow's boyfriend.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]