Reply to: RE>>Wings
I too have just purchased on OMS dual bladder B.C. and appreciate the compact
design and the quality of workmanship. Combining the B.C. with the OMS
stainless steel backplate make for a functional, durable piece of dive
equipment.
Len Tillim
------------------------------
Date: 11/17/94 3:04 PM
To: Tillim, Len
From: Richard Pyle
On Tue, 15 Nov 1994, Mr I.M. Horsfall wrote:
> What I want to know, preferably from people who have experience of more
> than one make, is which make is the best for the price (the Uk price will
> be different, but the difference between makes will be similar), which is
> most comfortable to wear (I have a neoprene drysuit), which has the easiest
> tank attachment to use and is a double bag model worth the extra.
I started out with an original Dive-Rite Single bladder Wings B.C., and
was very impressed with its quality. I recently purchased an OMS
dual-bladder B.C. (wings-style), and am EXTREMELY impressed with its
quality. The two-bladders-in-one-shell offers (in my opinion) the perfect
compromise between redundancy and compact design. Add to that the elastic
bands which keep the deflated B.C. very streamline, and you've got a very
good piece of dive equipment. It also allows several dump options, and
two sets of holes to mount to the backplate.
I've heard that Dive-Rite has/will soon introduce a dual-bladder,
single-shell wings-style B.C. with elastic bands, but I don't know
anything about it.
I have no first-hand experience with the Zeagle, but several people I know
who have used them have told me they don't think they're as good. (But
that's second-hand info)
Aloha,
Rich
deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@opal.com'.
Send subscription/archive requests to `techdiver-request@opal.com'.
------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by atdmac.sp.trw.com with SMTP;17 Nov 1994 14:55:06 U
Received: from fulton.opal.com (daemon@fu*.op*.co* [198.3.124.1])
by bighorn.terra.net (8.6.9/jr2.10) with ESMTP
id WAA23462; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 22:36:08 -0500
Received: from localhost (daemon@lo*)
by fulton.opal.com (8.6.4/jr2.9)
id WAA02963; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 22:31:41 -0500
Precedence: bulk
Errors-To: owner-techdiver@opal.com
Received: from bishop.bishop.hawaii.org (bishop.bishop.Hawaii.Org
[128.171.128.2])
by fulton.opal.com (8.6.4/jr2.9) with SMTP
id WAA02941; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 22:31:36 -0500
Received: by bishop.bishop.hawaii.org (AIX 3.2/UCB 5.64/4.03)
id AA19733; Tue, 15 Nov 1994 17:21:44 -1000
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 1994 17:14:39 +22305714 (HST)
From: Richard Pyle <deepreef@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*>
Subject: Re: Wings
To: "Mr I.M. Horsfall" <imh@li*.ac*.uk*>
Cc: techdiver@opal.com
In-Reply-To: <199411152014.UAA28540@ux*.li*.ac*.uk*>
Message-Id: <Pine.3.05a.9411151736.A46394-b100000@bi*.bi*.ha*.or*>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]