In a message dated 9/16/98 3:21:50 PM Eastern Daylight Time, divetek@oc*.co* writes: > Sean, > Have you ever made a dive on wreck as a recreational diver and the plan > called for a depth limit of 120' but the wreck was in 170' of water? In all honesty...no. I always have, and always will plan for the deepest part of the wreck.... Have > you ever made a Gulfstream drift dive to 100' in 3500' of water? No...blue water stuff is not much to my liking, but you never know I could change my mind. I lived in Okinawa, Japan when I was in the 'Corps and did more 500' + walls then I could ever remember, but I was always on air...Nitrox was like Buck Rogers lasers guns...not imaginable (how things change!) I guess you > rule out these practices. Your attitude and views are hypocritical. How so...I practice what I preach. I set my PO2 to 1.4 for the working portion of the dive and 1.6 for my deco. Even on my reacreational dives, which FAR outnumber my tech dives, I always stick the 1.4...you taught me that in my IANTD Instructor course... :-) Me being hypocritical would require me to do something I tell others not to do. You can ask ANY of my students...1.4 is the limit. Period. > As a tech diver you may use the mix you feel adequate for the mission. As a > recreational Nitrox diver you are forced to take on the responsibilities > that go with it. Better be good or you're gonna need lots of help. > Jim Still going strong after all these years...so I guess I'm doing something right. BTW I was the one who found your grappel on the RSB-1...that's gotta be worth a beer or two!! Sean -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]