On 15 Nov 1994, HeimannJ wrote: > >John Heimann wrote: > > > >>Hank Garvin came up with a porthole and I brought up a cage lamp, but > >>none of the really serious artifacts have come up yet. > > > >Now I don't want to flame anyone, but here we have a wreck which has >hardly > been dived and which is out of range of most divers, so why do >we feel a > need to take 'artifacts' from it?.... > > One good reason to take artifacts from a virgin wreck is to identify it. I > believe there is some writing on the cage lamp I found, and the language > could at least identify the nationality of the wreck. One isn't always lucky > enough to find the name still painted on the bow of most wrecks! > > John As a serious wreck diver who has assisted inidentifing many "virgin wrecks" neither I or my associates have every had to remove an artifact to identify a wreck. Take only pictures and leave the wrecks intact for future divers to enjoy. Curt =========================================================================== Curt W. Smitka, Administrative Manager Phone: (313) 936-0702 Department of Environmental Fax: (313) 764-9424 and Industrial Health E-mail: CWSMITKA@UM*.ED* School of Public Health University of Michigan ===========================================================================
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]