On 15 Nov 1994, HeimannJ wrote:
> >John Heimann wrote:
> >
> >>Hank Garvin came up with a porthole and I brought up a cage lamp, but
> >>none of the really serious artifacts have come up yet.
> >
> >Now I don't want to flame anyone, but here we have a wreck which has >hardly
> been dived and which is out of range of most divers, so why do >we feel a
> need to take 'artifacts' from it?....
>
> One good reason to take artifacts from a virgin wreck is to identify it. I
> believe there is some writing on the cage lamp I found, and the language
> could at least identify the nationality of the wreck. One isn't always lucky
> enough to find the name still painted on the bow of most wrecks!
>
> John
As a serious wreck diver who has assisted inidentifing many "virgin
wrecks" neither I or my associates have every had to remove an artifact
to identify a wreck. Take only pictures and leave the wrecks intact for
future divers to enjoy.
Curt
===========================================================================
Curt W. Smitka, Administrative Manager Phone: (313) 936-0702
Department of Environmental Fax: (313) 764-9424
and Industrial Health E-mail: CWSMITKA@UM*.ED*
School of Public Health
University of Michigan
===========================================================================
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]