Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: <RLatulip@ao*.co*>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 1998 08:50:36 EDT
To: kens@ac*.ne*
Cc: cavers@ca*.co*, kirvine@sa*.ne*, techvid@ne*.co*,
     freeattic@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*, techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject: Re: Re: The Problem With Chrissy
In a message dated 8/28/98, 7:41:41 AM, kens@ac*.ne* writes:
<<This is a very important point that seperates us from them chief. I 
remember the first time I came down to your place (to pick up my 
scooter), Ralph Fenton stopped by and you gave him the "Doing it 
Right live" rendition and showed him all the gear and tricks. At that 
time I didn't know who Ralph was, but I thought it was cool that you 
took the time to show someone that obviously wasn't 
involved in the project everything we do and how we do it. >>

That's right I remember when Ralph told me about going to
George's house a few years back. He was glad that he got the
attention and then he changed all his gear over (Ralph was my
cave instructor several years ago). George also had me over and
went over my gear as well.  He didn't ask for anything in return and
he was very helpful.  Now I am at the pool three days a week working
out with the master swimmers.  Yes it was hard at first as these guys
are super fast but as long as your committed they let you in the club.  
As for christopher brown's comment that George said he took the
risk out of cave diving that is bullshit.  It was Sheck who said that
about George.

Chris you need to cut the convoluted bullshit.  These last few post
from you were really off the wall as in tangent to nowhere land.
Maybe this Mr. Mom thing has gotten to you because your 
beginning to reason like a three year old. 

Even  Aristotle had you pegged 350 B.C.

On Sophistical Refutations by Aristotle, Written 350 B.C.E 
Translated by W. A. Pickard-Cambridge

"Let us now discuss sophistic refutations, i.e. what appear to be
refutations but are really fallacies instead. We will begin in the natural
order with the first. 

That some reasonings are genuine, while others seem to be so but
are not, is evident. This happens with arguments, as also elsewhere,
through a certain likeness between the genuine and the sham.
For physically some people are in a vigorous condition, while others
merely seem to be so by blowing and rigging themselves out as the
tribesmen do their victims for sacrifice;... 
....In the same way both reasoning and refutation are sometimes
genuine, sometimes not, though inexperience may make them appear
so: for inexperienced people obtain only, as it were, a distant view of
these things. For reasoning rests on certain statements such that they
involve necessarily the assertion of something other than what has
been stated, through what has been stated: refutation is reasoning
involving the contradictory of the given conclusion..."

Ray LaTulippe


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]