Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Tue, 25 Aug 1998 22:19:34 +1000
To: Wrolf Courtney <wrolf@co*.ne*>
From: bdi <bdi@wh*.ne*>
Subject: Re: Fitness envy and more Wrolfing stupidity
Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com
At 12:05 PM 24/08/1998 -0400, Wrolf Courtney wrote:
>
>I have several times referred to myself as an engineer in discussions, during
>the many years that techdiver has been in existence.  And I have used that
>description with an intent to appeal to my authority, rather than to reason.
>
>And I do not see it in the archives.
>
>I am a computer scientist.

etc....

Wrolf. Thank you for sharing with us.
Is your B.S. like a bachelors' degree
in science?

rgrds  billyw





  Graduated 1986 from SUNY at Stonybrook, B.S. (cum
>laude), major in Computer Science.
>
>Computer Science was regarded there, as at Imperial College, where I had
>previously studied Computing Science (sic), as an engineering discipline.  At
>Imperial, the Department of Computing is in the City and Guilds College (rather
>than the Royal School of Mines, or the Royal College of Science), and at least
>when I was there, part of the orientation was that we were (budding) engineers.
>
>Does not sound controversial today, but back in 1980, everyone wanted a piece
of
>the pie.  The mathematicians liked that Turing stuff, wanted it all as a branch
>of applied mathematics.  (Some of) the electrical engineers knew that computers
>were just programmable logic arrays plus memory.  That was their stuff, and
they
>wanted it all too.  Heck, some universities divided Computer Science between
the
>two, to enrichment of neither, but killing the discipline.
>
>I was pretty into this, having been a teenage hacker who learned Algol 60 at
>thirteen; helped a friend with his SCMP-II kit (he was good with the soldering
>gun and the circuit diag, but he didn't even know what a register was!); and
>picked up babes at a high school math conference at the University of Kent with
>my ability to do some BASIC programming with the free accounts we were given.
>
>The faculty were much relieved that I had not picked up bad programming habits,
>unlike about half the new class, who were getting BASIC programming in high
>school en masse for the first time.  But I had been turned on to structured
>programming by a mentor, a former M.Sc.(Computer Science) alum of Imperial. 
His
>thirteenth birthday gift to me was the classic, Structured Programming
>(Dijkstra, Hoare, Dahl), still in my collection.
>
>My fellow students were amazed and perplexed when they would ask me  how I had
>mastered Pascal so quickly, and I would wave at them the Wirth's minuscule
>Pascal Language Reference Manual.  But I had Algol-60 and (most of, no one
knows
>all of) Algol-68 under my belt, the immediate precursors.  I pseudo coded and
>top down refined away (far better than every before I went to Imperial), and
>after a while, I had "eaten" the LRM, and it stayed in my locker.
>
>Meanwhile, my personal and family life went south.  A long way south.  I did
not
>complete the second year.
>
>After bumming around for a while unable to find work (this was the early 1980s,
>in Britain), I left for a new life in Israel.  Leave it all behind, rediscover
>my Jewish heritage.  Which I did.
>
>I also discovered that I genuinely was really into computers.  That once I had
>looked outside myself, my family situation, my dead brother ... that then I
>could look back in.
>
>And I did not want to do Computer Science for my family.  I did not want to do
>it just because it was such a safe choice, and my uncle had even shown the way.
>Not for my teachers, nor even for my mentor who turned me on to it.  Not for
>Jeremy, my closest, bestest friend, my dead brother, whom I had sworn to
protect
>when I was 2 1/2 and he was 1 1/2, and had no one else to protect him.
>
>It was for me.  I just liked this stuff.  It was cool.  I mean, like horn
clause
>logic does not have negation, but you really need negation by failure to make
>Prolog useful at all.
>
>And as I learned at Stonybrook, there are very good reasons for that.
>
>During Stonybrook to help pay for it all: part time small business programming,
>and net installation and configuration.
>
>Then a small (but now very successful) Wall Street software firm, to get into
>the big time, programmer plus network guy (since I knew how, from the last
job).
>
>Then two bulge bracket investment banking firms, originally as a programmer
with
>a net.sideline, but after a couple of years, full-time net.geek.
>
>Immediately before my son was born, moved out of the financial industry.  I had
>pretty much realized what the pattern was here, and since I was not female, I
>could not do the hanging on to the glass ceiling that they could.  And I wanted
>to be able to not cry at my leaving party.
>
>I am serious.  You never saw a harder worker than Dan.  If you turned up at
2:00
>a.m. and Dan was not there, you were in the wrong place.   And I certainly did
>not see them significantly slack off after his girl was born.  He was a lifer,
>born to it.  Swore that he would do what it took, he wanted to stay.  Had our
>boss behind him 200% - who else would do what he did to manage the Fixed Income
>systems (I did the Equities).
>
>When the order came down to fire him, Bill had no choice.  I could see in his
>eyes.  And then Dan cried as we walked away from the party.
>
>When my wife's due date was set, I knew I had only about two or three months
>after the delivery.  C'est la vie.  The Street is no place to raise a kid.
>
>Bounced around a bit, trying management.  But I am an engineer, not a manager
of
>engineers and associated staffs.
>
>I work now in a firm that handles back office processing of advertising orders.
>I am one of three in the router group.  Router configuration/troubleshooting;
>performance monitoring and programming; internet access and security.
>
>Relevant?  Not much.
>
>Was mentioning that I am an engineer relevant, or a chest pulling reference to
>(one's own) authority, rather than to facts and the theories that can be built
>on them?
>
>Yes.  Mea culpa, mea culpa, mea maxima culpa.  Peccavi.
>
>Now for your turn.  If you do not have the data, just call for help on, say,
>techdiver.  Or even cavediver.  Check carefully the photographs in Tom Mount's
>"Mixed Gas", in the gear configuration chapter.  I have already received two
>fairly complete replies myself!
>
>--
>Wrolf
>
>Wrolf's Wreck:     http://www.concentric.net/~Wrolf
>Wrolf's Net.Wreck: http://www.concentric.net/~Wrolf/netmgmt.shtml
>
>
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]