Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Dan Volker" <dlv@ga*.ne*>
To: "Tech Diver" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>, "Lucas Reinfield" <lucrein@ao*.co*>
Subject: Re: Brett Gilliam/TDI head....Do drugs and heading an agency mix? Mounting Death toll says NO!
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 1998 09:07:39 -0400





Lucas Reinfield wrote in article <6phprq$gvq$1@ba*.cc*.tu*.fi*>...[Jammer
Six <jammer@oz*.ne*>] wrote:
>
>> Everyone else, TDI, NAUI, PADI, IANTD, IRS, NVA - A Non- Zero Death Rate.
>> One group knows how to do extreme diving, the outer edge of the sport,
>> without dying.
>> The other doesn't.
>> Questions?
>
>You can't compare the death ratings between
>the largest scuba organisation and WKPP!
>
> Luke
>

Luke,
I think too many people are missing the point of what this statement
implies.....
We are talking about taking very specific proceedures and equipment, and
"testing" them in the most extreme and harshest technical environment any of
us care to dive in.  What  "The Comparison" shows is that there "IS" a safer
way to perform advanced diving---diving in which the diver needs to optimize
what he/she can get out of themselves.  And there are many "Wrong Ways"
 deep air, stuffing the long hose, 80/20 mix, failure to stencil large MOD
markings on tanks in scenarios where multiple mixes are found with divers in
the water, ETC,  ETC.) .

This is NOT in itself,  a condemnation of PADI, NAUI, or even IANTD..... It
is a "source" of proceedures that advanced instruction agencies "SHOULD"
benefit from, since they have a "grab bag" full of proceedures and gear
choices, but their testing capacity does not come close to the environment,
and exposures of the WKPP testings. And the "RESULTS" obtained by the WKPP
divers irrefutably show that the proceedures and equipment/configurations
they are using generate zero deaths, in a sample base far larger than that
needed to accurately predict a presidential election, i.e., the statistical
base for extrapolation is larger than is needed, to represent the "best"
proceedures/equipment/configurations.

We see death tolls mounting, and we see in each case, WKPP proceedures were
not followed----this having complicity in the tragic end for each diver.
WKPP does NOT want to be a training agency--it never will be. But WKPP does
not like to see diveres die from breaking rules we know to be
essential ---so you see we have a great deal of advice from WKPP, in "Doing
it Right" diving, which goes to IANTD and TDI, which could have saved the
lives of the majority of TDI/IANTD  divers lost in the last two years ---but
the advice goes largely as ignored. Probably, one reason for its being
ignored is that is not always offered "nicely". But lives are at stake, and
how nicely George sugar coats his advice, should NOT be the prerequisite for
whether Mount or Giliam takes his advice, and change standards accordingly.

In a "perfect world", IANTD and TDI would continue to prosper, by using
"Doing it Right" tested proceedures and gear configurations. They would have
a MUCH lower death toll, but two enormous egos would have to swallow some
pride.

Instead, after years of having the most extensively tested proceedures and
gear configurations ignored by MOUNT and GILLIAM,     you hear posts from
the "Doing it Right" crowd, which are insulting to Mount and Gilliam.

If you "knew" your way would save lives, and that Brett's would kill---and
you saw his way KILLING, and KILLING, and KILLING, at what point would you
get so pissed at him, you would only be able to say bad things about him,
and would find yourself unable to say things like " well Brett, I know you
are one of the world's best divers, but this is really something you might
want to consider----we, in our limited experience, think this might save
some lives....."  Most of us would puke at the thought of saying something
like this, and the idea of "sucking up to his ego", only to be ignored
anyway, is too much to take.  So we can expect better results if the world
hears the "other truth", and this will include the insurance carriers who
don't need to sugar coat their dealings with training agencies either. And
the insurance carriers WILL have the balls to tell Mount and Gilliam what to
do, at some point in the not so distant future.
Regards,
Dan Volker




--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]