Well, John, Why don't you write a well-written response to Dive Training? People continue to talk about this stuff but the only thing we do is gripe among ourselves. Jack -----Original Message----- From: john.r.strohm@BI*.co* [mailto:john.r.strohm@BI*.co*] Sent: Monday, July 20, 1998 7:57 AM To: techdiver@aquanaut.com Cc: cavers@ca*.co* Subject: The Beat Goes On "Dive Training" magazine, August 1998, p. 14. Letter to the Editor from one Bret C. Gilliam, decrying the magazine's stance on ppO2(max). "Dive Training" ran an article recently that, among other things, recommended a ppO2(max) of 1.4 ata. Gilliam is saying that 1.6 ata ppO2(max) is perfectly OK, provided the NOAA time limits are also observed. And the problem is that the world is going to read this, and say "This is one of the big guys and he must know what he is talking about". And Gilliam's List will continue to grow. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]