On 7/16/98 5:23, Mike Zimmerman, zimmmt@au*.al*.co* said: >Diver is diving wet. Is the backup bladder a benefit or a liability. >The conditions are such that a dry suit is not required but is >an alternate form of backup buoyancy. The diver wants _a_ form of >backup buoyancy. How does the backup bladder in OMS wings present >more failure points than a drysuit? Wrong question, Mike. The diver wants a form of backup buoyancy, fine. Doesn't the diver want the BEST form of backup? The question isn't whether double wing provide *A* form of backup, the question is are they the BEST form of backup? No. A drysuit is much better. If you want something that ranks #2 or lower, perhaps the AOL forum can help. >compare and contrast. 500 words or less. I'm sure I'm under. ------------ "C'mon, you sons of bitches, you want to live forever?" -First Sergeant Dan Daly, 1918 ------------ -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]