On 7/16/98 5:23, Mike Zimmerman, zimmmt@au*.al*.co* said:
>Diver is diving wet. Is the backup bladder a benefit or a liability.
>The conditions are such that a dry suit is not required but is
>an alternate form of backup buoyancy. The diver wants _a_ form of
>backup buoyancy. How does the backup bladder in OMS wings present
>more failure points than a drysuit?
Wrong question, Mike.
The diver wants a form of backup buoyancy, fine.
Doesn't the diver want the BEST form of backup? The question isn't
whether double wing provide *A* form of backup, the question is are they
the BEST form of backup?
No. A drysuit is much better. If you want something that ranks #2 or
lower, perhaps the AOL forum can help.
>compare and contrast. 500 words or less.
I'm sure I'm under.
------------
"C'mon, you sons of bitches, you
want to live forever?"
-First Sergeant Dan Daly, 1918
------------
--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]