Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
> I assume that you are a extended range diver with some sense and are > using a drysuit. Never make assumptions Jim. > This is not an argument about replacing a drysuit with > an extra bladder. If you had read what I wrote, I specifically stated I was questioning the situation where a diver WAS NOT WEARING A DRYSUIT. So yes, I was speficially (attempting to) discuss the merits of a second bladder in the BC compared (in place of) to a drysuit. > the second bladder which caused them to rocket to the surface). What is > the sense with this, Mike, will you please explain why this is better > than planning for and using your drysuit, will you, Mike, will you??? If you read what I write sometimes, you'd see you were refuting the wrong argument ;-) I picked the subject, so let's finish it... the subject is this..... Diver is diving wet. Is the backup bladder a benefit or a liability. The conditions are such that a dry suit is not required but is an alternate form of backup buoyancy. The diver wants _a_ form of backup buoyancy. How does the backup bladder in OMS wings present more failure points than a drysuit? compare and contrast. 500 words or less. Are we on the same topic now? :-) Mike -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]