Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Subject: Re: OMS wings
Date: Thu, 9 Jul 1998 13:42:56 -0400
From: Jim Cobb <cobber@ci*.co*>
To: <zimmmt@au*.al*.co*>
cc: "techdiver" <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Airplanes use a concept called "Camber", which is the horizontal angle 
one wing has to the other. The more camber the wings have the more stable 
the airplane but the less maneuverable. Stunt planes have a very low or 
even negative camber, but they are very hard to fly and will wear you out 
trying to keep them straight and level.

As I don't tend to spin around on my axis frequently when I dive I prefer 
a the reasonable "camber" that a set of standard wings provide. I tend to 
dive with my tanks up and my face down looking for goodies and lobsters 
on the bottom. To me the bondage results in negative camber which does 
not suit my style of diving.

 Jim


Sender: Mike Zimmerman  Date: 7/9/98 1:17 PM

>Think about it this way Jim... if at little away from you is better than
>closer to you, then why not go whole hog... put your buoyancy device
>10 feet above you... or 20 feet... as I see it, it should come down to
>simple lever mechanics.... lift 10 lbs in your hand.  Now put
>10 lbs at the end of a 20ft rod and try to lift it.. it will
>be harder.  The same should hold true (I would expect) for
>the bouyancy.  To roll over you have to force a buoyant mass to
>go deeper than it wants to.  Again, the further from the center
>of rotation, the harder it should be.
>
>Mike


 -------------------------------------------------------------------
 Learn About Trimix at http://www.cisatlantic.com/trimix/trimix.html


--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]