It seems that on divesites the AIR II and such like devices are the
regulators (if you can call them that) are usually the devices failing -
they can be prone to failure (not necessarily that make) and as stated why
add another weak link when other options are available.

Colin Bell

-----Original Message-----
From:	Errol Kalayci [mailto:errol@ga*.ne*]
Sent:	06 June 1998 01:17
To:	Scubagator@ao*.co*; techdiver@aquanaut.com
Subject:	Re: AIR II on a wing...Hogarthian or Not...?

You can breath off the inflator mechansim if you had too, or buddy breath,
so why add an Air II?  You already have a 7' long hose & a short one.
Errol
-----Original Message-----
From: Scubagator@ao*.co* <Scubagator@ao*.co*>
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Date: Friday, June 05, 1998 4:44 PM
Subject: AIR II on a wing...Hogarthian or Not...?


>Hogarthian or not...we have been pondering this, and I have asked a few on
the
>list already, there has been no real consensus either way.
>
>Adding an AIR II to a wing...would it be considered an unnecessary failure
>point?
>
>Sean Cary
>--
>Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
>Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
>

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]