Dan wrote: >Tom, >Thanks for answering this post as well as you have. As a result of this >increased level of moral responsibility which you have just demonstrated, >I will assure you that my future postings on this issue will hold you in >much higher regard, and I'll even go so far as to apologize for the >emotionally charged charicterizations SNIP Speaking of reports, has there been yet a comprhensive report - by IANTD or anyone else - on the actual facts of the WPB debacle? So many statements of unknown accuracy were made here, and repeated so many times, that they have become the accepted account of what happened - yet for all we know, much of those facts may also be just Volkerisms like the ones referred to above. For example, was the student really wearing 4 steels? Was he really wearing redundant bondage wings? And probably most important of all, could he really have had only 89 previous dives? Best I can recall, the agency in that disaster was also IANTD, so the board referred to in Tom's post must have done a similar investigation to what he has described. Are the results available? -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]