Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "Dan Volker" <dlv@ga*.ne*>
To: <techdive@ea*.ne*>
Cc: <techdiver@aquanaut.com>
Subject: Re: Does IANTD believe an instructor should NOT pursue a sinking student?
Date: Mon, 18 May 1998 23:14:09 -0400



>Dan Volker wrote:
>
>>  Tom,
>> I have just heard from Alan Pelstring----the dead girl's boyfriend, that
>> Derick McNulty is still teaching, and that he had students over the
>weekend.
>
>   Dan, you seem to post a rather large amount of hear-say on this
>list.       Are you sure everything that you are spouting off about is
>factual?

To John Walker,  ....
I'm trying to be extremely factual. In this l;ast post, I know from multiple
sources that Derrick was teaching.  Let Tom Deny it---obviously he will not
be able to.


>
>> Tom, is it IANTD  "Standard Operating Procedure",  for instructors to "
>NOT PURSUE" , a sinking student? Derick has now stated to the investigators
>that he felt his life would be in jeopardy if he was to attempt to  descend
>after Jane. As you know, this was with less than 13 minutes bottom time ,
>and with close to 2/3  of his  back gas left.  So again, "Should an IANTD
>instructor, who is "buddied" to his student,  NOT PURSUE this student,
>should the student begin  a descent which clearly represented the student
>was in an emergency situation" ????
>
>   Dan, curious to know if you were there wene this statment was given
>to    the investigators.  If not, how did you here this?

Like I said, I talked to the investigator. This is in the record.  You
already read this in my post. If you don't like hearing it from me, too
bad.


>

>
>>No one has heard you condemn  Derrick,  for actions which are clear to
>everyone else on this list, as  negligent.
>
>   SPEAK FOR YOUR SELF DAN! I,m on the list and not much more is clear
>to me    except for the fact that you are accusing people of murder for
>a accident    that took place while diving. By the way, is this an
>attempt for you to     promote GUE, by hammering the rest of the
>technical agenies that may be     someday be competition?    HMMMMMM.
>If so, than I've got some GUE for      you.


First, I do not teach, that is not what I dive for...i.e., I do not enjoy
the idea of teaching---I enjoy the act of diving.   And it is an attempt by
me to portray what I feel are negligent actions by an IANTD instructor,
which have so far  been ignored by  IANTD.    I would praise IANTD if they
were to take a stand AGAINST   Derrick, and I will have praise for any
agency which has standards of a much higher caliber---as GUE as proposed,
will have.  If you have a problem with tech divers that want  the list to
hear about "better and safer" ways of diving, as  opposed to the established
methods that are allowing deaths, then you have the problem, and you better
learn to deal with it.


>> If you want to be the only one who wants to stand there and say that
>Derrick was performing his duty properly, I think most will agree that this
>position by you will tell the world a great deal about IANTD----and they
>won't like what they just heard.
>
>   Jesus Christ!  Now your speaking for the whole world.
>
>> And as Alan Pelstring just told me that Derrick has had a grand total of
9
>> months from being an open water diver, to becoming an instructor
>trainer---you might want to comment as to whether this is true---and if so,
>> HOW is it possible for IANTD to crank out an instructor trainer so
>fast????
>
>   And what organization is it that made Darek an open water instructor
>with    less than a year or experience. Sounds like more political(BRAVO
>SIERRA)    to me.
>
>>So far you have ignored my posts to you----I'll assume you did not like my
>tone, so you chose not to answer me.
>
>   Can't say I blame him personally.
>
>> Sorry Tom, I felt this girl was murdered by Derrick.
>
>   Dan, just what is your interpitation of murder? As I see it, it would
>be    the unlawful premeditated killing of a human being.  Seems to me
>that       both Tom and Derrick could have a case against you for
>defemation of        charactor.
>

Obviously you are  unfamiliar with the manslaughter guidlines. Look up FS
782.07     I read it, and I know several prosecutors who agree with me that
this case should be prosecuted.  I have absolutely NOTHING to worry about
regarding defamation of character.


>> This belief would make most people with any shred of moral decency,
pretty
>> upset.
>
>  As it makes me upset you are such a little tatal tailing baby.

Whoever you are,  don't waste my time saying this shit to me  from the
safety of your keyboard.  I want to see you say this to my face, and for you
to  wonder whether  it will be a survivable experience for you.  I'm not
running for any offices, I don't have any popularity agendas, and I could
give a rat's ass whether or not  you like what I have to say.  I know
"exactly" the law,  on what I can and can't do to a loud mouth like you, in
an in-person, confrontation.  But of course , we both know you'd never let
it go this far, don't we.  The difference between me and you, aside from the
obvious stupidity you  demonstrate from your positions in this post, is that
I'll say anything  in person that I'll say online---to you or Tom.  I'm
still waiting for Mount to show up and spar with me in WPB.   You have the
same offer anytime, tough guy..


>>  Would I have been  right to call you an accomplice to this murder ----
>> probably this would have been an unfair characterization of you,
>> particularly since I know that if you had been the instructor, you would
>> have gone down after her, and you would have saved Jane's life. George
>> Believes this, as to Robert, Bill, Errol  and myself.  So we know how the
>> top guy at IANTD would have handled this  situation.  We know how a 9   >
month IANTD wonder named Derrick handled this.  There is NO continuity    >
here.
>
>   Were is your individuality,DAN. Is that a bad word with you.

John,  Where are your brains???

>
>> Either he teaches like you , or he doesn't, and it looks to us like he >
does NOT.  So how about admitting that Derrick did not perform his job the >
way an IANTD instructor is supposed to. How about becoming part of a >
solution here, by preventing more students from death, at the hands of an >
instructor who is incapable of acting as you would require him to act.
>
>   Again, what about some individuality?  Often that brings great things
>to    the chalkboard.  Please explain to me the down side of it.

And again. Where are your brains???

>
>> Show me you have the balls to tell the truth here----or has martial arts
>> training to "5th dan" only taught you how to " run and hide today--live
> and run another day ( the credo Derrick obviously goes by, but hopefully
> you do not...).
>
>  I also feel Tom is showing me a lot of mature control right now by not
>kicking your ass.

Put some money on it.  I'd love the workout, as short as it would be, it
would still be fun. But in fairness to Tom, he's a little old to be sparring
with me.

 How much instructional scuba have you done Dan.  By
>that I meam teaching scuba?  All this verbal diarrhea sound to me to be
>a bunch of negitive hype towards IANTD in order to open the doors for JJ
>new and upcomming organization.
>      Sincerly, John Walker

If you are not aware of the enormous number of instructional  errors being
committed here by IANTD instructors--even just between the West Palm Beach
triple death Tragedy, and this  more  recent one, then you are not prepared
to have this discussion.  And like I said, I do not want to teach---it is
NOT the highest form of diving---it is a different direction to pursue, a
good one yes, but not mine.  It is a very different avocation than the
diving interests I have.
Worse still, I don't like having to clean up IANTD instructor  messes every
few months. Right now, we have a bad pattern developing.
As for opening the doors for JJ,  guys like Derrick and Andre Smith are
performing this action, not me. I'm not the one killing students----and I'm
not pretending anything is happening that has not happened---but it sounds
like you and Tom Mount would like very much for everyone to pretend that
NOTHING has happened.
Guess what. A girl died. Her instructor watched her  sink, did nothing, and
allowed her to die.  I'm waiting to hear whether Tom Mount is ready to say
this was wrong, or to say it was right.
As for you, the only thing I want to hear is when you want to meet me for a
sparring session at Gile's Gym.  Either that, or learn how to talk on the
internet,  the way you would in person.
Dan Volker





--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]