Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

From: "C. Randy Bohrer" <underwaterapplications@co*.co*>
Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 19:48:13 EDT
Subject: Diver Death in Pompano B. Fl......"Murder on the IANTD Express" ---student killed by instructor
To: techdiver@aquanaut.com
I've been complaining about this for a while now. I continue to hear stories
about instructors doing "half-assed" classes (meaning classes that don't meet
standards, or taking students that have not met pre-requisites). The typical
one is the two dive trimix class, that is often taught to students that are
nitrox certified and have dive "a few" deep wrecks on the new set of doubles
they put together at the beginning of the season. I've never been able to do
much about the individual stories, because I have only second and third hand
information.

I used to cut a lot of corners back around 1993, because most of my students
were already "technical divers" and by standards, I could give credit for
experience. It was not necessary to do 16 dives with them before putting them
on trimix (the TDI progression is Nitrox - 0 dives, Adv Nitrox - 4 dives, Deco
- 4 dives, Extended Range - 6 dives, Trimix - 4 dives). But now, we have "real
students" -- Those that need the material and skills taught to them in stages,
separated by experience on their own. Apparently there are some instructors out
there, who couldn't possibly remember the days when tech diver students were
already tech divers, but still think they can skip a bunch of stuff and go
right to trimix.

I continue to hear from prospective students about how they can go to other
instuctors, go from nitrox diver to trimix diver in one season, for half the
cost of my course(s) with one third the number of dives. I don't want these
"card collectors" in my classes anyway.

I strongly discourage (and often prohibit) students from using convoluted or
unfamiliar equipment on training dives. In fact, I'm running a course right
now, where I asked that one student replace the combo inflator/second stage
regulato on his BC with a standard power inflator. I also asked that another
student NOT put a hose on the inflator mechanism of the backup bladder of a
dual bladder BC because it created a hose routing problem. I'm a little
embarrassed that I'm even bragging about my classes. The stuff I'm doing is
nothing to brag about, it's basic diver training stuff - nothing
extra-ordinary, everyone should be doing it. Full face masks, communication
equipment, etc. have no place in tech diver training - this stuff belongs in a
specialty course.

How do we stop this nonsense of standards violations? Simple - Send evaluation
forms to all students of new instructors and randomly to students of
established instructors. Maybe the students won't bother sending them back, or
maybe they'll lie? That's OK, the threat that an honest evaluation uncovering
standards violations will get back to the training agency and result in an
offending instructor being "found out" might be enough to either make the
"half-assed" instructors straighten up their act, or get out of the business.

"Hey man, send me some money, a release and medical form, do your classroom
work by correspondence, book a Doria charter. When you get back, I'll give you
your trimix ticket! No sweat man! Piece o' cake!" THIS HAS GOT TO STOP.

Sincerely,
C. Randy Bohrer, President
Underwater Applications Corp

Original Message Follows:

From: "Ken Sallot" <ken@co*.ci*.uf*.ed*>
Organization: CIRCA, University of Florida
Date: Mon, 4 May 1998 15:28:20 EST
Subject: Re: Fw: "Murder on IANTD Express, cont.

Dan,

If this is true then "Derek" should have his instructor card 
revoked. If everything I have read about this incident is true, then 
there was severe gross negligence here which will only result in 
hurting this sport.

Being a former TDI trimix instructor, I would never even consider 
taking a student on their first dive in a trimix class in 300' of 
water. Let alone their first trimix dive.

My schedule was usually first dive in confined water, maybe a place 
like Orange Grove, to check on bottle handling skills, task loading, 
run some stress management drills, and simulate decompression.

However, the first trimix dive would never be deeper then 210-220', 
and that would only be in situations where I felt that the students 
were prepared for it. 

If after the first dive (the confined water drills) the student was 
not prepared for a trimix dive, then we'd do more diving in shallow 
water to work with the gear and drills.

I know it might be "allowed", but there is no reason for a trimix 
student to do their first dive to 300'. You know, in a place like 
Pompano/Lauderdale a perfect first dive for a trimix class would be 
either the Lowrance (210' on the sand) or the Hydro (175' on the 
sand). What the hell were they doing at 300'?

As for not having enough "gas to do the rescue", what good would this 
guy have been at depth if the student ran out of gas?

Also, what's the story with those dive communicator things? Jesus 
this is really scary. 

Although I don't necessarily agree with the tone of some of the other 
messages in this thread, you do have to question what the hell is 
going on when the trimix training fatalities for 1998 are 
overwhelmingly high.

Ken



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]