Mailing List Archive

Mailing List: techdiver

Banner Advert

Message Display

Date: Fri, 1 May 1998 02:34:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: "William M. Smithers" <will@tr*.co*>
Subject: Re: just when you thought
To: KybrSose <KybrSose@ao*.co*>
Cc: cobber@ci*.co*, SHPWRK@ao*.co*, techdiver@aquanaut.com

On Fri, 1 May 1998, KybrSose wrote:
> Both tanks are tied together by a pressure hose. When that hose blows< and
we
> all know it will>  You lose both gas supplies. You have to shut your primary
> and the little bottle does not have a valve. If the second free flows you cant
> shut it off and you are losing your only source of gas.  A first stage failure
> is covered by the  little bottle but the dreaded tank neck o ring failure is
> still there. But if you dont maintain your first, are you going to maintain
> this thing? You cant hand it to another diver. 
>

You are missing the point - only a moron would leave it attached to
the primary during the dive.  You boost the pressure when it needs
to be refreshed, then disconnect the thing - easy filling.
 
> Then there is the mindset behind this thing. You can't pay attention to your
> gas supply?  You shouldnt be in the water.  If this is only for emergency use
> then shouldnt it be bullet proof?? 

Again, you're missing the point.  The presumption is that of main
supply failure, which is a fair assumption if you have are diving
singles.  A check valve is pretty reliable - again, considering
the nature of recreational diving.  

> If your plan is suck your main dry and
> shoot straight up fine. If its suck your main dry and ascend on the pony fine.
> But then you need enuff gas to ascend safely and a 13 is the edge of that
> envelope. The outer edge.  This will give you what ten twelve breaths from 120
> fsw?. Just slightly better than a spare air suppository.  And we all know this
> will wind up at that depth in the hands of that diver. 
> 

Al, it is always wise to do the math before making a 
strong statement - especially when you know you're dealing with
people who do the math regularly. 

At an RMV of 0.5 cfm, you will get about three minutes at 120 fsw 
from an AL13. But in the event of a failure, as a recreational
no-deco diver, you won't be at depth anything like 3 mins - you'll 
start the ascent immediately.  If you start the ascent immediately, 
and assuming an ascent rate of 30fpm, you will use about 7.0 cu. ft of 
gas to get to the surface - about half of your AL13.  Add in some minor 
decompression and/or a safety stop, and you still have enough gas.

Same holds true even if you plan for a hooverish 0.7 cu. ft. RMV,
although you are going to have to trim your safety stop (which
is just that - for safety, and holds a very small probability 
of inducing bends if it is blown off - and the resulting bends
are rarely if ever life-threatening anyway).

>  If you have a real pony you can switch to it and motor home. This is a
> convolution, right up there with bungee wings, 80/20, metal to metal, poodle
> jackets and curb feelers on the sides of your doubles.  It's crap.
> 

My point: dont't do a classic knee-jerk by sucking Hogarthian dick here.
The right tool for the right job - and dive circumstances.  I stick:
for recreational diving, it's a whole different ball of wax - don't
be so quick to pass judgement with the eyes of a technical
diver - that is called hubris - or have you forgotten your roots?

-Will



--
Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'.
Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.

Navigate by Author: [Previous] [Next] [Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject: [Previous] [Next] [Subject Search Index]

[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]

[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]