Mailing List Archive Mailing List Archive
Sorry Doug , I misunderstood. I did see the original thread but didn't relate the two. Too little O2 here, I guess...:-) On 5 Apr 98 at 11:32, DOUG MATHIESON wrote: > Date: Sun, 05 Apr 1998 11:32:56 -0400 > From: DOUG MATHIESON <mathieson@go*.ne*> > To: Tony Matheis <tonym510@fl*.co*> > Cc: techdiver@aquanaut.com > Subject: Re: DECO help-MISSING O2 VALVE > > > Tony Matheis wrote: > > > Doug, How many triage situations would you have going on one bottle of > > O2 that most boats carry, most of them have one mask of each type not > > multiple. Unless there is a CF of magnitude then multiple patients in > > triage shouldn't be in the equation. > > I understand that all valves in place to provide the highest FO2 is what > > is desired, my question is why would it have been removed if there would > > be only one patient on a bottle and that patient was going to be > > continuously monitored? I don't understand that statement "We might run > > out of O2.. Well and good, but if the patient is being tended properly it > > shouldn't pose any hazard. > > > > Tony > The original thread of this discussion was regarding whether the > ambulance would be taking a non rebreather mask off a DCS patient that a > fellow diver had applied and replacing it with their own mask which in > all probability would already have one of the side valves removed to > allow in ambient air in case of O2 depletion > > The triage situation I was referring to was a ambulance one,not a dive > accident > > I have already stated that in the case of DCS I would be replacing our > missing valve > Cheers Tony -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]