Smithers said: >And while >those factors may be mass/volume per tissue-half-time related, >they clearly do *not* have a correlation to vascularity, >except for the noted fact that people in better cardio-vascular >shape are less likely to be fat-asses, and hence have per-tissue-volume >halftime ratios that more likely reflect the average. > >Granted, this is splitting hairs...a fat fuck is still a fat fuck, >and obviously more likely to get bent... The only problem with this statement is that it is directly contradicted by the hog experiment previously cited. The two groups of hogs DID NOT DIFFER in fat-assedness, or in distribution of fat-assedness. BOTH groups had slim, svelte hogs and HFS hogs, and DCS incidence within the groups was UNCORRELATED with fat-assedness. If the HFS hogs in each group had gotten more DCS than the slim, svelte hogs in each group, your claim that being a fat-ass was a predisposition for DCS would have been supported. Sorry. The real world disagrees with you. The significant point of the experiment was that the treadmill conditioning was NOT enough to affect the HFS quotient of the hogs in question. They were still HFS hogs, just in better cardiovascular conditioning. The next experiment, taking a third group of hogs and training them up to Arnold Schwarzenporker condition, then seeing what that does to DCS susceptibility, has yet to be performed. -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]