In a message dated 98-03-08 03:30:25 EST, GarlooEnt@ao*.co* writes: << Dan > >Where do you come up with these ridiculus figures ?? >> Hi Dan, My qustion exactly. How do you, and the WKPP conduct studies? Are you trained in scientific procedure? Seems to me there is a lot of the cart going before the horse in your statements. You have an idea, you draw a conclusion. Why not do the research in the proper manner, publish your results and conclusions, and then leave it open for public forum debate. This is SOP in the scientific community. I would also be interested in seeing the hard data and procedures used in testing the OMS bondage wings. Keep calm, the last time I mentioned them, I was accused of trying to with withold vital gear information to the tec community by yourself and Mr. Mee. Many people use these wings in the NE, and I would like to know what the hard data is for the WKPP's claims. It will be interesting to see what control parameters were used in securing the bungies, how many different ways, and positions were used in securing them, and how resistance was measured at different stages of inflation. Please publish your findings to the group. This is not a challenge, or an endorsement of bondage wings. I would just like to know that when statements are made by individuals or groups regarding tecnical issues, that they are treated scientifically, not emotionally.. Best regards, Kevin Gannon -- Send mail for the `techdiver' mailing list to `techdiver@aquanaut.com'. Send subscribe/unsubscribe requests to `techdiver-request@aquanaut.com'.
Navigate by Author:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Author Search Index]
Navigate by Subject:
[Previous]
[Next]
[Subject Search Index]
[Send Reply] [Send Message with New Topic]
[Search Selection] [Mailing List Home] [Home]